By name: template-academic-paper-reviewer description: | Read-only manuscript review, methodology review, re-review, and calibration workflow for template projects. USE WHEN the user asks for peer review, referee-style critique, methods/statistics review, or verification that revisions addressed prior comments. metadata: version: "1.0.0" last_updated: "2026-05-25" status: active data_access_level: verified_only task_type: open-ended modes: - full - quick - methodology-focus - re-review - calibration related_skills: - template-academic-paper - template-manuscript-claim-verification - template-validation-quality
Academic paper reviewer
Read-only review workflow for template manuscripts. Review reports are separate artifacts; this skill does not edit the manuscript directly.
Natural invoke
- "Review this manuscript like peer reviewers"
- "Focus only on methodology and statistics"
- "Check whether my revisions address the comments"
- "Calibrate the review rubric against a known decision set"
Inputs to confirm
- Manuscript - project manuscript directory or provided paper file.
- Mode - full, quick, methodology-focus, re-review, or calibration.
- Review lens - target venue, discipline, methods, and known reviewer comments.
- Evidence access - rendered PDF, source markdown, output artifacts, validation reports, and claim ledgers.
Workflow
- Read-only boundary - produce reports, matrices, and recommendations only; route edits to academic-paper.
- Panel lenses - separate contribution, methods, evidence/citations, presentation, reproducibility, and adversarial-overclaim checks.
- Evidence audit - cite source file paths, generated artifacts, evidence registry entries, and validation reports when flagging issues.
- Revision traceability - in re-review mode, map each reviewer concern to author action, verification status, residual risk, and next owner.
- No sycophantic concession - do not soften a finding unless new evidence from the manuscript or artifacts resolves it.
Deliverables
- Review package: summary verdict, major issues, minor issues, evidence table, and recommended next actions.
- Methodology-focus mode: methods validity, data/analysis reproducibility, statistical or formalism concerns.
- Re-review mode: traceability matrix with comment, response, evidence checked, verified, and residual issue.
- Calibration mode: rubric, expected decision labels, observed disagreement, and confidence caveats.
Verification commands
uv run python -m infrastructure.validation.cli prerender projects/<project>/manuscript --repo-root .
uv run python -m infrastructure.validation.cli evidence projects/<project> --fail-on-issues
uv run python -m infrastructure.prose.cli report projects/<project>/manuscript