lgtest

name: lgtest description: When the user invokes "LGTest", reviews the most recent changes (especially from the current chat, but not limited to it) and proposes adding new tests—unit, UI, smoke, API, or integration—as appropriate. Use when the user says "LGTest" or asks to review changes and propose tests.

LGTest — Review Changes & Propose Tests

Trigger: User says "LGTest" (or equivalent). Agent reviews recent changes and proposes new tests.

Workflow

1. Gather recent changes

Use (in order of relevance):

• Primary: Files modified or discussed in the current chat (edits, diffs, mentions).
• Secondary: git status and git diff (uncommitted or last commit).
• Optional: Recent commits or branch diff if user implied “branch” or “PR”.

Treat chat-edited paths as highest priority; git state as fallback or extension.

2. Map changes to test surface

For each changed or affected area, decide:

Project rule: all test entry is via run_tests.py (smoke | unit | api | integration | ui | e2e).

3. Propose new tests

Output a LGTest Proposal in this shape:

## LGTest Proposal

### Changes in scope
- [path or area 1]
- [path or area 2]

### Proposed tests

| Type | Target / new file | Rationale |
|------|-------------------|-----------|
| unit | tests/services/test_foo.py | Covers new FooService.bar() |
| api  | tests/api/test_baz_api.py | New /baz route |
| ui   | tests/ui/test_baz_ui.py   | New Baz page and buttons |

• Type: one of unit, ui, smoke, api, integration, e2e.
• Target: existing file to extend, or tests/<category>/test_<name>.py for new.
• Rationale: one line linking change to test (e.g. “New endpoint X”, “New workflow step Y”).

Add a short Implementation notes list only when useful (e.g. “reuse fixtures from test_bar_api.py”, “mark as @pytest.mark.ui”).

4. Execution

• Do not create or edit test files until the user approves or asks to implement.
• If the user says “go”, “implement”, “add them”, etc., implement the proposed tests and wire them into run_tests.py if that’s required for discovery (in this project, discovery is path-based, so usually no run_tests.py edits needed).
• After adding tests, run the relevant group (e.g. python3 run_tests.py api) and report success/failure.

Conventions (this project)

• Test runner: python3 run_tests.py [smoke|unit|api|integration|ui|e2e]
• UI tests: Playwright; live under tests/ui/ and tests/e2e/.
• New tests must be discoverable by the existing run_tests.py categories (path-based).

Example

User says "LGTest". Recent chat edited src/web/routes/workflow_config.py and src/web/templates/workflow.html.

Proposal:

Implementation notes: Extend existing workflow UI test if present; add API test for any new route in workflow_config.py.