By name: review-lesson
description: Review a lesson for accuracy against Claude Code docs
argument-hint: ""
Review Lesson
Review the lesson $ARGUMENTS for accuracy against official Claude Code documentation.
Steps
Read the lesson
- If a number is given (e.g., "04"), read
learn-claude/04-*.md - If a file path is given, read that file
- If a number is given (e.g., "04"), read
Check against official docs
- Fetch https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/claude-code for reference
- Also check https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/claude-code/cli-usage
- Cross-reference any claims in the lesson
Review for
- Accuracy - Is the information correct?
- Completeness - Is anything important missing?
- Currency - Is anything outdated?
- Clarity - Is it easy to understand?
Output Format
## Lesson Review: [Title]
### Accuracy
- ✅ Correct: [list accurate claims]
- ❌ Incorrect: [list inaccuracies with corrections]
- ⚠️ Outdated: [list outdated info with updates]
### Missing
- [Important topics not covered]
### Suggestions
- [Improvements to make]
### Verdict
[PASS / NEEDS UPDATES / MAJOR REVISION NEEDED]
Guidelines
- Be specific about what's wrong and how to fix it
- Reference the official docs for corrections
- Note if something couldn't be verified
- Prioritize factual accuracy over style