By name: dk-agent-native-audit description: "Run comprehensive agent-native architecture review with scored principles. Audits a codebase against 8 agent-native architecture principles (Action Parity, Tools as Primitives, Context Injection, Shared Workspace, CRUD Completeness, UI Integration, Capability Discovery, Prompt-Native Features) by launching parallel sub-agents and producing a scored report. Use when the user wants to evaluate how agent-friendly their architecture is, or audit specific principles. Triggers on: 'agent native audit', 'architecture review', 'how agent-friendly is this', or /dk-agent-native-audit." argument-hint: "[optional: specific principle to audit, e.g. 'action parity' or '1']" allowed-tools: Bash, Read, Grep, Glob, Task disable-model-invocation: true
/dk-agent-native-audit — Agent-Native Architecture Review
Conducts a comprehensive review of the codebase against agent-native architecture principles, launching parallel sub-agents for each principle and producing a scored report.
Context
Core Principles
| # | Principle | One-liner |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Action Parity | Whatever the user can do, the agent can do |
| 2 | Tools as Primitives | Tools provide capability, not behavior |
| 3 | Context Injection | System prompt includes dynamic context about app state |
| 4 | Shared Workspace | Agent and user work in the same data space |
| 5 | CRUD Completeness | Every entity has full Create, Read, Update, Delete |
| 6 | UI Integration | Agent actions immediately reflected in UI |
| 7 | Capability Discovery | Users can discover what the agent can do |
| 8 | Prompt-Native Features | Features are prompts defining outcomes, not code |
Workflow
Step 1: Load reference material
Read references/agent-prompts.md in this skill's directory to get the detailed prompt for each sub-agent. That file contains the exact instructions, search strategies, and output format for all 8 principle audits.
Step 2: Check for single-principle audit
If $ARGUMENTS specifies a single principle, only run that one sub-agent. Valid argument forms:
| Argument | Principle |
|---|---|
action parity or 1 |
Action Parity |
tools or primitives or 2 |
Tools as Primitives |
context or injection or 3 |
Context Injection |
shared or workspace or 4 |
Shared Workspace |
crud or 5 |
CRUD Completeness |
ui or integration or 6 |
UI Integration |
discovery or 7 |
Capability Discovery |
prompt or features or 8 |
Prompt-Native Features |
For single-principle audits, run one Explore sub-agent and present its findings directly — no summary table needed.
Step 3: Launch parallel sub-agents
Launch 8 parallel sub-agents using the Task tool with subagent_type: Explore, one per principle. Each agent should:
- Enumerate all relevant instances in the codebase (user actions, tools, contexts, data stores, etc.)
- Check compliance against the principle
- Provide a specific score in
X out of Y (percentage%)format - List specific gaps and recommendations
Read references/agent-prompts.md for the exact prompt to give each agent. Pass the full agent prompt from that file — don't summarize it.
Step 4: Compile summary report
After all agents complete, compile the summary using this template:
## Agent-Native Architecture Review: [Project Name]
### Overall Score Summary
| Core Principle | Score | Percentage | Status |
|----------------|-------|------------|--------|
| Action Parity | X/Y | Z% | STATUS |
| Tools as Primitives | X/Y | Z% | STATUS |
| Context Injection | X/Y | Z% | STATUS |
| Shared Workspace | X/Y | Z% | STATUS |
| CRUD Completeness | X/Y | Z% | STATUS |
| UI Integration | X/Y | Z% | STATUS |
| Capability Discovery | X/Y | Z% | STATUS |
| Prompt-Native Features | X/Y | Z% | STATUS |
**Overall Agent-Native Score: X%**
### Status Legend
- Excellent (80%+)
- Partial (50-79%)
- Needs Work (<50%)
### Top 10 Recommendations by Impact
| Priority | Action | Principle | Effort |
|----------|--------|-----------|--------|
### What's Working Well
[List top 5 strengths]
Success criteria
- All 8 sub-agents complete their audits (or the single requested one)
- Each principle has a specific numeric score (X/Y format)
- Summary table shows all scores and status indicators
- Top 10 recommendations are prioritized by impact
- Report identifies both strengths and gaps