prompt-repetition-optimization - SKILL.md Agent Skill

name: Prompt Repetition Optimization description: This skill should be used when the user asks to "improve performance", "optimize query", "use prompt repetition", "repeat my prompt", mentions "Google Research prompt paper", or discusses non-reasoning vs reasoning tasks. Provides research-backed guidance on when and how to apply prompt repetition for performance gains. version: 0.1.0

Prompt Repetition Optimization

Overview

Prompt repetition is a simple yet effective technique discovered by Google Research that improves LLM performance on non-reasoning tasks by enabling each prompt token to attend to every other prompt token. The technique transforms <QUERY> into <QUERY><QUERY>, allowing bidirectional attention in causal language models.

Key benefits:

47 wins, 0 losses across major models (Gemini, GPT, Claude, DeepSeek)
No latency penalty (only affects parallelizable prefill stage)
No output format changes
Safe even with reasoning tasks (neutral to slightly positive)

When to Use Prompt Repetition

Best for Non-Reasoning Tasks

Apply prompt repetition to tasks that don't require complex multi-step reasoning:

Multiple Choice Questions:

Especially effective with "options-first" format (options before question)
Example: "A, B, C, D... Which is correct?"

List Navigation:

Finding Nth item in a list
Finding item between two other items
Example: "What's the 25th name?" or "What appears between X and Y?"

Simple Queries:

Fact retrieval
Basic transformations
Short prompts (under ~500 characters)

Pattern Recognition:

Simple classification tasks
Basic matching operations

Less Effective for Reasoning Tasks

Avoid emphasizing repetition for tasks requiring complex reasoning:

Multi-step planning
Complex debugging
Deep analysis requiring chain-of-thought
Tasks already using "think step by step"

Note: Prompt repetition is neutral to slightly positive even with reasoning enabled (5 wins, 1 loss, 22 neutral), so it's safe to use but provides minimal benefit.

How to Apply Prompt Repetition

Recognize Opportunities

When user submits a prompt, evaluate if it's a non-reasoning task:

Non-reasoning indicators:

Short, direct questions
Multiple choice format
List-based queries
Fact retrieval requests
Simple classification

Reasoning indicators:

"Plan", "design", "analyze"
Multi-step requirements
Complex debugging
Already using chain-of-thought

Recommend Appropriate Method

For non-reasoning tasks, suggest using one of the available commands:

Simple Repetition (/repeat-last):

Default recommendation
Format: <QUERY><QUERY>
Best for most non-reasoning tasks

Verbose Repetition (/repeat-verbose):

Format: <QUERY> Let me repeat that: <QUERY>
Sometimes performs better than simple repetition
Good for longer prompts

Triple Repetition (/repeat-3x):

Format: <QUERY> Let me repeat that: <QUERY> Let me repeat that one more time: <QUERY>
Substantially better on certain tasks (NameIndex, MiddleMatch)
Use for complex list navigation or pattern matching

Example Recommendations

User asks: "Which of these options is correct? A) ... B) ... C) ... D) ..."

Respond: "This is a multiple-choice question, which is a non-reasoning task that benefits from prompt repetition. Try using /repeat-last to improve accuracy."

User asks: "Help me plan the architecture for this system"

Respond: "This requires complex multi-step reasoning. Prompt repetition won't significantly help here, as the task already involves chain-of-thought processing."

User asks: "What's the 25th item in this list: [long list]"

Respond: "List navigation tasks benefit greatly from prompt repetition. Consider using /repeat-3x for maximum accuracy on this type of task."

Task Classification Guidelines

Non-Reasoning Task Examples

Tasks where prompt repetition shows strong gains:

Multiple choice - Select from given options
List indexing - Find Nth element
Item matching - Find element between two others
Simple lookup - Retrieve fact from context
Basic classification - Categorize into predefined groups
Pattern matching - Find simple patterns

Reasoning Task Examples

Tasks where prompt repetition provides minimal benefit:

Planning - Design architecture, create roadmap
Analysis - Deep investigation, root cause analysis
Synthesis - Combine multiple concepts
Debugging - Trace complex issues
Chain-of-thought - Already using step-by-step reasoning
Creative generation - Write stories, design solutions

Implementation Notes

Why It Works

Causal language models process tokens left-to-right where past tokens cannot attend to future tokens. This means token order affects prediction performance. Repetition enables each prompt token to attend to every other prompt token, addressing positional limitations.

Performance Characteristics

Accuracy improvements:

Small gains on standard benchmarks (question-first format)
Large gains on options-first multiple choice
Dramatic gains on list navigation (21% → 97% on NameIndex)

No cost concerns:

Output length unchanged
Latency unchanged (except very long prompts on some models)
Generation speed unaffected

Variants comparison:

Simple repetition: Reliable baseline
Verbose: Sometimes outperforms simple
Triple (×3): Often substantially better on specific tasks

Edge Cases

When NOT to recommend:

Very long prompts - May affect latency, limited by context window
Already repeated - Don't suggest if user already applied repetition
Streaming reasoning - Extended thinking already active
Code generation - Usually not helpful for generating code

User Guidance

When recommending prompt repetition:

Explain why: "This is a non-reasoning task that benefits from repetition"
Suggest specific command: /repeat-last, /repeat-verbose, or /repeat-3x
Set expectations: "Research shows this improves accuracy without increasing latency"
Provide context: Reference Google Research findings if user is interested

Don't oversell: Repetition is a simple optimization, not a magic solution. Be honest about when it helps and when it doesn't.

Additional Resources

Reference Files

For detailed information, consult:

references/google-research-paper.md - Full paper details, benchmarks, and findings
examples/task-types.md - Comprehensive examples of non-reasoning vs reasoning tasks

Research Background

The technique is based on "Prompt Repetition Improves Non-Reasoning LLMs" by Leviathan, Kalman, and Matias (Google Research, December 2024). The paper tested 7 models across 7 benchmarks and found consistent improvements on non-reasoning tasks.

Commands Available

Users can apply prompt repetition using these commands:

/repeat-last - Simple repetition
/repeat-verbose - Verbose framing
/repeat-3x - Triple repetition

These commands are provided by the prompt-repeater plugin.

Quick Decision Guide

Use this decision tree to recommend prompt repetition:

Is the task non-reasoning? (multiple choice, list navigation, fact retrieval)
- YES → Recommend /repeat-last or /repeat-3x
- NO → Continue to step 2
Is the task complex reasoning? (planning, debugging, analysis)
- YES → Don't emphasize repetition, neutral benefit
- NO → Continue to step 3
Is the prompt very long? (>2000 characters)
- YES → Warn about potential latency, still safe to use
- NO → Recommend /repeat-last
Is it a list navigation task? (find Nth, find between X and Y)
- YES → Recommend /repeat-3x for maximum accuracy
- NO → Recommend /repeat-last as default

Best Practices

Evaluate task type first - Determine if non-reasoning before recommending
Start simple - Default to /repeat-last unless specific reason for others
Explain the benefit - Help users understand when and why to use it
Don't over-apply - Not every task needs repetition
Monitor feedback - If repetition doesn't help, acknowledge and adjust

Summary

Prompt repetition is a research-backed technique that consistently improves performance on non-reasoning tasks without latency penalty. Recommend it when users have multiple choice questions, list navigation tasks, or simple queries. Use simple repetition by default, verbose for variety, and triple for maximum accuracy on specific tasks like list navigation.