name: ny-commercial-disputes description: > Use when drafting or filing a commercial-litigation action — breach of contract, fiduciary duty, business torts, fraud, account stated, UCC disputes, shareholder oppression, judicial dissolution. Triggers include '22 NYCRR 202.70 Commercial Division', 'CPLR 3016(b) fraud particularity', 'BCL 1104-a oppression', 'BCL 720 fiduciary duty', 'LLC Law 702 dissolution', 'Faithless Servant Doctrine', 'business divorce NY', 'judicial dissolution'. Covers Commercial Division at 22 NYCRR § 202.70 (separate procedural rule set, county-by-county thresholds, proportionality-in-discovery); BCL fiduciary duty and dissolution; Faithless Servant Doctrine; 9% pre-judgment interest under CPLR 5004; CPLR 3016(b) fraud-pleading particularity; and GOL §§ 5-1401 / 5-1402 choice-of-law / forum-selection ($250k/$1M thresholds make NY a destination forum). version: 0.1.2
New York Commercial Litigation
NOT LEGAL ADVICE. Commercial Division practice has rules that materially differ from general Supreme Court practice; verify the assigned Commercial Division Justice's Part Rules and the venue's Commercial Division threshold before filing.
SOL catalog (the most-used)
| Claim | SOL | Citation |
|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract (written or oral) | 6 years | CPLR 213(2) |
| Breach of fiduciary duty | 3 or 6 years — depends on remedy sought (3 yr if damages; 6 yr if equitable / fraud-adjacent) | CPLR 214(4) / 213(7); IDT Corp. v. Morgan Stanley |
| Fraud | 6 years (or 2 years from discovery, whichever is later) | CPLR 213(8) |
| Account stated | 6 years (tracks the underlying contract) | CPLR 213(2) |
| UCC Article 2 (sales) breach of warranty | 4 years | UCC § 2-725 |
| UCC Article 3 negotiable instrument | 6 years | CPLR 213(2) / UCC § 3-118 |
| Conversion | 3 years | CPLR 214(3) |
| Tortious interference with K | 3 years | CPLR 214(4) |
| Tortious interference with prospective economic advantage | 3 years | CPLR 214(4) |
| Breach of fiduciary duty (in BCL § 720 derivative action) | 6 years | CPLR 213(7); BCL § 720 |
| BCL § 1104-a oppression / judicial dissolution | no SOL — equitable | BCL § 1104-a |
The Commercial Division (22 NYCRR § 202.70)
The Commercial Division is a specialized Part within Supreme Court Civil Term — a single Justice (or rotating panel of designated Justices) hears commercial cases with their own procedural rule set. Different rules apply to Commercial Division cases than to regular Supreme Court cases.
County-by-county monetary thresholds
| County | Threshold |
|---|---|
| New York County | $500,000 |
| Westchester County | $200,000 |
| Nassau County | $200,000 |
| Queens / Kings / Bronx | $150,000 |
| Erie / Suffolk | $100,000 |
| Albany / Onondaga | $50,000 |
| Monroe | $50,000 |
(Verify the current 22 NYCRR § 202.70(a) table before filing — thresholds adjust periodically.)
Subject-matter qualification (22 NYCRR § 202.70(b))
Commercial Division qualifying matters include (non- exhaustive):
- Breach of contract / business dealings
- UCC transactions
- Transactions between commercial entities
- Joint venture / partnership disputes
- Internal-affairs disputes of business entities
- Breach of fiduciary duty by directors / officers
- Statutory shareholder oppression / dissolution
- Securities disputes (subject to federal preemption)
- Antitrust under NY Donnelly Act (Gen Bus Law § 340)
- Commercial real-property disputes (not residential L&T)
Excluded even if over the threshold: PI, wrongful death, matrimonial, residential L&T, criminal, consumer-debt collection.
Commercial Division-specific rules
The Comm Div has its own rule set at 22 NYCRR § 202.70 with Appendix A containing 36 specific rules. Highlights:
- Rule 1 (Appearance by Designated Counsel) — partner / designated attorney must appear at conferences
- Rule 8 (Consultation Prior to Preliminary Conference) — meet-and-confer on the scheduling order template
- Rule 11-a (25-Question Interrogatory Cap) — even more restrictive than CPLR 3130's 25-question default
- Rule 11-c (Proportionality in Discovery) — the proportionality test for ESI / document production
- Rule 11-d (Privilege Logs) — categorical privilege logs accepted instead of document-by-document
- Rule 16 (Direct Testimony By Affidavit) — bench-trial direct examination by affidavit
- Rule 17 (Length of Papers) — 25 pages for memos of law (more than the 22 NYCRR § 202.8-b 10-page default in regular Supreme Court); 5 pages for affirmations in support; 35 pages for memos on dispositive motions
- Rule 19 (Adjournments) — strict adjournment policy
- Rule 33 (Accelerated Adjudication) — opt-in expedited procedure with discovery limits + early-trial scheduling
Substantive frameworks
CPLR 3016(b) — heightened fraud pleading
Fraud allegations must be pled with particularity under CPLR 3016(b). The complaint must specify:
- The specific misrepresentation (precise words, date, speaker, audience)
- The falsity of the statement
- The scienter (knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard)
- The reliance (justifiable)
- The damages caused by reliance
A complaint that pleads fraud in general terms is subject to dismissal under CPLR 3211(a)(7) for failure to state a cause of action.
BCL § 720 — derivative action for fiduciary breach
Shareholders may bring a derivative action on behalf of the corporation against directors and officers for:
- Breach of fiduciary duty
- Self-dealing / conflict of interest
- Waste of corporate assets
Demand requirement: under Marx v. Akers, 88 N.Y.2d 189 (1996), the shareholder must either make a demand on the board or plead demand-futility with particularity.
BCL § 1104-a — judicial dissolution / shareholder oppression
Holders of 20%+ shares in a closely-held corporation can petition for judicial dissolution on grounds of:
- Illegal, fraudulent, or oppressive actions toward the petitioner
- Looting, wasting, or diverting of corporate assets
The corporation can avoid dissolution by electing to purchase the petitioner's shares at fair value under BCL § 1118 — a procedural escape valve used in many cases.
LLC Law § 702 — LLC judicial dissolution
LLCs have an analogous dissolution remedy under LLC Law § 702 — judicial dissolution available when it is "not reasonably practicable" to carry on the LLC business. Matter of 1545 Ocean Avenue LLC, 72 A.D.3d 121 (2d Dep't 2010), is the leading interpretation.
Faithless Servant Doctrine
NY recognizes the Faithless Servant Doctrine — an employee who commits substantial disloyalty during employment forfeits all compensation paid during the period of disloyalty, even if some work was actually performed. Phansalkar v. Andersen Weinroth & Co., 344 F.3d 184 (2d Cir. 2003) is the key articulation.
Pre-judgment interest (CPLR 5001 / 5004)
NY pre-judgment interest in contract cases is 9% per annum (CPLR 5004) — substantially higher than market rates. The interest accrues from the date of breach. The plaintiff in a long-running contract dispute may recover substantial interest at trial.
For tort claims, pre-judgment interest runs from the date the cause of action accrues (CPLR 5001(a)) — but is not available for personal-injury pain-and-suffering damages.
Choice of law + forum selection (GOL §§ 5-1401, 5-1402)
NY General Obligations Law makes NY especially friendly to commercial parties choosing NY law / NY forum:
- GOL § 5-1401: a NY choice-of-law clause is enforceable in contracts involving at least $250,000 even if the contract has no other NY contact
- GOL § 5-1402: a NY choice-of-forum clause is enforceable in contracts involving at least $1,000,000 even if the parties have no other NY contact
These rules make NY a destination forum for sophisticated commercial contracts — many M&A agreements, large financing arrangements, and tech deals choose NY law and forum specifically for the GOL §§ 5-1401 / 5-1402 enforceability.
Account stated — debt-collection adjacent
In commercial-debt-collection actions, the account stated doctrine is a major cause of action. The elements:
- Account rendered (typically by invoice or statement)
- Express or implied acknowledgment of the account by the debtor
- Failure to object within a reasonable time (silence may be acknowledgment)
The 6-year SOL under CPLR 213(2) governs. Default-judgment practice in commercial collections often combines breach of contract + account stated for redundant pleading.
BCL § 624 — books-and-records inspection
Shareholders can compel a corporation to permit inspection of books and records by proper purpose demand under BCL § 624. Common in lead-up to derivative actions or shareholder oppression petitions.
Composition with other ny- skills
ny-statewide-format— caption + Notice of Motion formatny-discovery— CPLR Article 31; Commercial Division proportionality rule + privilege log + interrogatory cap are stricter than general Supreme Courtny-first-30-days— Answer + CPLR 3211(a) pre-answer motionsny-deadlines— SOL + 22 NYCRR § 202.8-b page limits (vs. Comm Div Rule 17 25/35-page rules)ny-hearings— motion practice and trial structureny-fact-check— citation patterns (Marx v. Akers; 1545 Ocean Avenue; IDT Corp. v. Morgan Stanley; Reed, Roberts Associates)ny-nyco(1st JD Comm Div $500k threshold),ny-kings($150k threshold),ny-bronx,ny-nassau($200k threshold),ny-queens($150k threshold) — venue selection for Commercial Divisionny-pro-se— pro se practice in Comm Div is rare due to the $50k-$500k thresholds + complexity
High-yield commercial checks
- Commercial Division eligibility? Monetary threshold
- subject-matter qualification + statement at filing?
- CPLR 3016(b) particularity met for fraud claims?
- CPLR 213(2) 6-year breach vs CPLR 213(8) 6/2-year fraud discovery rule?
- GOL §§ 5-1401 / 5-1402 forum/choice-of-law for contract enforceability?
- BCL § 720 derivative-action demand requirement or demand-futility pleading?
- BCL § 1104-a / LLC § 702 dissolution petition with § 1118 buyout-election triage?
- Comm Div Appendix A rule-set differences (25-page memo limit, proportionality, designated counsel, accelerated adjudication)?
- Pre-judgment interest 9% under CPLR 5004 calculated from breach date?
- Faithless Servant Doctrine applicable to a disloyal-employee fact pattern?
Pro-se resources
Commercial Division pro se practice is uncommon — the $50k-$500k thresholds plus the complexity of Comm Div Rules mean most parties retain counsel. For solo / pro se inquiries:
- NYS Bar Association Commercial and Federal Litigation Section — referral
- NYC Bar Lawyer Referral Service — Commercial Division panel
- Comm Div Justices' Part Rules — published at
nycourts.gov/courts/comdiv/