verify

star 1.3k

AI DevKit · Enforce evidence-based completion claims — require fresh command output before reporting success. Use when completing any task, fixing a bug, finishing a phase, running tests, building, deploying, or making any "it works" claim.

codeaholicguy By codeaholicguy schedule Updated 5/9/2026

name: verify description: AI DevKit · Enforce evidence-based completion claims — require fresh command output before reporting success. Use when completing any task, fixing a bug, finishing a phase, running tests, building, deploying, or making any "it works" claim.

Verify

Prove it works before saying it works.

Hard Rules

  • Do not claim completion without fresh terminal evidence from this session.
  • Forbidden words in completion claims: "should", "probably", "seems to", "likely", "I believe", "I think it works". These signal unverified assertions.
  • Cached, remembered, or previous-session output is not evidence. Run it again.

Gate Function

Every completion claim must pass all 5 steps in order:

  1. Identify — What command proves this claim? If multiple commands are needed, run the gate once per command.
  2. Run — Execute the full command now. No partial runs, no skipping.
  3. Read — Read complete output. Check exit code. Count pass/fail.
  4. Confirm — Does the output prove the exact claim?
  5. Report — State the result, cite command, exit code, and key output.

If any step fails, stop. Fix the issue and restart from step 1.

If no verification command exists (e.g., no test suite), tell the user and ask them how to verify before claiming done.

Verification Patterns

Claim Required Evidence Not Sufficient
Tests pass Test output: 0 failures, exit 0 Previous run, "should pass now"
Build succeeds Build output: exit 0 Linter passing, partial build
Bug is fixed Reproduce symptom → now passes "Changed code, should be fixed"
Linter clean Linter output: 0 errors Single file check
Phase complete Each criterion verified individually "Tests pass, so done"
Feature works E2E test or manual walkthrough Unit tests alone

Regression Verification

For bug fixes, a single pass is not enough:

  1. Write a test covering the bug.
  2. Run → must pass (fix in place).
  3. Revert the fix.
  4. Run → must fail (proves test catches the bug).
  5. Restore the fix.
  6. Run → must pass.

If step 4 passes, the test is wrong. Rewrite it.

Red Flags and Rationalizations

Rationalization Why It's Wrong Do Instead
"This change is trivial" Trivial changes break things constantly Run the check
"I ran it earlier" Code changed since then Run it again now
"The test is flaky" Flaky ≠ ignorable Fix the flake first
"It compiles, so it works" Compilation ≠ correctness Run the tests
"The CI will catch it" CI is a safety net, not a substitute Verify locally first
"The agent said it's done" Agent claims need verification too Check diff and run tests

Memory Integration

After a failed verification, store the failure pattern: npx ai-devkit@latest memory store --title "<failure pattern>" --content "<what failed and how to avoid>" --tags "verify,failure-pattern"

Install via CLI
npx skills add https://github.com/codeaholicguy/ai-devkit --skill verify
Repository Details
star Stars 1,313
call_split Forks 209
navigation Branch main
article Path SKILL.md
More from Creator
codeaholicguy
codeaholicguy Explore all skills →