continuity-check

star 70

Scan manuscript for inconsistencies in characters, timeline, settings, and names

Ckokoski By Ckokoski schedule Updated 3/30/2026

name: continuity-check description: Scan manuscript for inconsistencies in characters, timeline, settings, and names author: AuthorClaw version: 1.0.0 triggers: - "continuity" - "continuity check" - "consistency check" - "find inconsistencies" - "timeline check" - "plot holes" - "check continuity" permissions: - file:read

Continuity Check Skill

Scan a manuscript (or set of chapters) for internal inconsistencies. This is not a style review — the goal is to catch factual contradictions within the text itself.

What to Check

1. Character Consistency

  • Physical descriptions: Eye color, hair, height, scars, tattoos — flag if described differently in two places.
  • Age and aging: Does a character's stated age match the timeline? Do children age appropriately between scenes set years apart?
  • Abilities and limitations: A character who can't swim in chapter 3 shouldn't be diving in chapter 12 without explanation.
  • Personality and knowledge: Flag moments where a character suddenly knows something they shouldn't, or behaves in a way that contradicts established traits without narrative justification.
  • Relationships: If two characters are introduced as strangers, they shouldn't reference shared history later (unless a reveal is intended).

2. Timeline and Chronology

  • Event order: Do flashbacks, references to past events, and "three days later" markers add up?
  • Travel time: If two cities are a week's ride apart, a character shouldn't arrive the next morning.
  • Day/night and seasons: If a scene starts at dusk, it shouldn't be noon two paragraphs later without a time skip. Winter shouldn't become summer in a single chapter unless time passes.
  • Parallel scenes: When cutting between storylines, do the timelines stay in sync?
  • Dates and ages: Any specific dates, years, or stated ages must remain consistent throughout.

3. Setting and World Details

  • Geography: A river that flows north in one chapter shouldn't flow south in another. Room layouts, building locations, and distances should stay fixed.
  • World rules: If magic costs energy, characters shouldn't cast freely without consequence. Technology, physics, and social rules must stay consistent.
  • Named places: Spelling and descriptions of locations should not change (e.g., "Thornfield Inn" vs "Thornfeld Inn").
  • Climate and environment: Vegetation, weather patterns, and environmental details should match the established region.

4. Names and Terminology

  • Character names: First names, surnames, nicknames, and titles must be spelled consistently. Flag any drift (e.g., "Katherine" in chapter 1 vs "Catherine" in chapter 8).
  • Place names: Same rule — no unexplained spelling changes.
  • Invented terms: Made-up words, species, technologies, or organizations should be spelled and capitalized the same way every time.
  • Titles and ranks: If a character is a Captain, they shouldn't be called Lieutenant later without a demotion scene.

5. Plot Threads and Objects

  • Chekhov's guns: Note significant objects or plot threads that are introduced but never resolved.
  • Resolved threads: Flag threads that are resolved without adequate setup.
  • Object tracking: If a character drops a sword in a fight, they shouldn't be holding it two scenes later without picking it up.
  • Information flow: If a secret is revealed to Character A in chapter 5, other characters shouldn't know it in chapter 6 unless told on-page or plausibly off-page.

Severity Levels

Categorize every finding into one of three levels:

ERROR — Definite contradiction

Two statements in the manuscript directly contradict each other. The reader will notice.

Example: "His green eyes narrowed" (ch. 2) vs "She looked into his brown eyes" (ch. 14)

WARNING — Probable inconsistency

Something looks wrong but could be intentional. Needs the author's judgment.

Example: A character who is terrified of heights willingly climbs a tower without internal conflict or acknowledgment.

INFO — Worth verifying

A detail that appears only once and could cause problems later, or a minor drift that might be a typo.

Example: A side character's name appears only twice, spelled slightly differently each time.

Output Format

Organize findings by category. For each finding, include:

[ERROR|WARNING|INFO] Category — Short description
  Evidence: "exact quote" (Chapter X / location)
  Conflicts with: "exact quote" (Chapter Y / location)
  Suggestion: How to resolve the inconsistency

Summary Section

After all findings, provide a summary:

Continuity Check Summary
========================
Errors:   X
Warnings: X
Info:     X

Most affected areas: [list the chapters or sections with the most issues]

Guidelines

  • Quote the text. Every finding must reference specific passages. Never say "somewhere in chapter 3" — give the actual line or paragraph.
  • Do not flag style choices. A character behaving unexpectedly is not an error if the narrative frames it as surprising. Only flag contradictions, not creative decisions.
  • Check the Book Bible first. If a Book Bible exists in workspace/memory/book-bible/, cross-reference it for established facts. If no Book Bible exists, build your reference from the manuscript text itself.
  • Work systematically. Read through the manuscript tracking facts on the first pass, then scan for contradictions on the second. Do not try to do both at once.
  • Group related issues. If the same character's name is misspelled five times, that is one finding with five instances, not five separate findings.
  • Be precise, not exhaustive. Ten real issues are more useful than fifty maybes. When in doubt, use INFO level rather than WARNING.
Install via CLI
npx skills add https://github.com/Ckokoski/authorclaw --skill continuity-check
Repository Details
star Stars 70
call_split Forks 34
navigation Branch main
article Path SKILL.md
Occupations
More from Creator