revising-findings

name: revising-findings description: Implement findings from verification reports with scope-based parallel workflow when_to_use: after /verify completes, when implementing common or exclusive issues from collation reports version: 1.0.0

Revising Findings

Overview

Systematic implementation of verification findings. Separates what to fix (verify) from how to fix it (revise). Enables parallel workflow where common issues can be implemented while cross-check validates exclusive issues.

Announce at start: "I'm using the revising-findings skill to implement [scope] issues from verification."

Quick Reference

Exclusive issue states:

• VALIDATED: Implement
• INVALIDATED: Skip automatically
• UNCERTAIN: Prompt user

Prerequisites

Before revising:

1. Collation report must exist (from /verify)
2. For exclusive or all scope: cross-check must be complete

Step-by-Step Workflow

1. Locate Collation Report

Find most recent collation:

ls -la .work/*-collated*.md | tail -1

If no collation found:

Error: No collation report found. Run `/verify` first.

2. Parse Scope

Determine what to implement:

3. Check Cross-check Status (if needed)

For exclusive or all scope:

Read collation report metadata:

• Cross-check Status: PENDING → Warn user, suggest /revise common
• Cross-check Status: COMPLETE → Continue

Warning message:

Cross-check still running. Options:
1. `/revise common` - Start with high-confidence issues now
2. Wait for cross-check to complete

4. Build Implementation List

For common scope:

• All issues in "Common Issues" section
• BLOCKING first, then NON-BLOCKING

For exclusive scope:

• Only issues with Cross-check: VALIDATED
• Skip Cross-check: INVALIDATED automatically
• Prompt for Cross-check: UNCERTAIN

For all scope:

• Common issues (all)
• Exclusive issues (VALIDATED only)
• Prompt for UNCERTAIN

5. Handle UNCERTAIN Issues

For each UNCERTAIN exclusive issue:

UNCERTAIN: "[Issue description]"
- Source: Reviewer #[1/2]
- Cross-check: [findings]

Implement? [Y/n/skip all]

6. Dispatch Implementation Agents

Agent selection:

Dispatch pattern:

Task tool:
  subagent_type: [agent from table]
  description: "Implement [issue summary]"
  prompt: "Implement this fix from verification:
    Issue: [description]
    Location: [file/location]
    Action: [what to do]

    Make minimal, focused changes."

Parallel dispatch: Independent issues can be dispatched in parallel.

7. Verify Implementation

After all implementations:

1. Run project tests/checks if applicable
2. Report completion status

Completion message:

Revise complete.

Implemented:
- Common issues: X/Y
- Exclusive (VALIDATED): X/Y
- Exclusive (UNCERTAIN): X/Y (user approved)
- Skipped (INVALIDATED): X

Run `/verify` again to confirm fixes?

Edge Cases

All Issues Already Fixed

All issues from collation have been addressed.
Run `/verify` to confirm, or continue with other work.

No Issues in Scope

No [common/exclusive] issues to implement.
[For common: All issues were exclusive - wait for cross-check]
[For exclusive: All exclusive issues were INVALIDATED]

Cross-check Never Completes

If user wants to proceed without cross-check:

/revise all --force

Warning: Implementing exclusive issues without validation.
INVALIDATED issues may be included. Proceed? [y/N]

Parallel Workflow Pattern

/verify docs
  ↓
Collation complete
  ↓
/revise common ← Starts immediately
  ↓                    ↓
[Implementing]    [Cross-check runs]
  ↓                    ↓
Done              Cross-check complete
                       ↓
                  /revise exclusive
                       ↓
                  All done

What NOT to Skip

• Checking cross-check status before exclusive/all scope
• Prompting user for UNCERTAIN issues
• Skipping INVALIDATED issues (they don't apply)
• Running tests after implementation

Related

• /cipherpowers:verify - Produces collation reports
• dual-verification skill - The verification workflow
• /cipherpowers:execute - Uses revise for fix implementation

Remember

• common scope works immediately (no waiting)
• exclusive requires cross-check complete
• INVALIDATED = auto-skip (cross-check proved it doesn't apply)
• UNCERTAIN = user decides
• Parallel workflow reduces total time