name: yolo description: Full-auto AI-DLC pipeline — from prompt to done. Automates the entire Idea -> Proposal -> Execute -> Verify lifecycle. license: AGPL-3.0 metadata: author: chorus version: "0.10.0" category: project-management mcp_server: chorus
Yolo Skill
Full-auto AI-DLC pipeline. User provides a prompt; agent drives the entire lifecycle: Idea -> Elaboration -> Proposal -> Review -> Execute -> Verify -> Done.
Overview
/yolo automates the complete AI-DLC workflow. You provide a natural language description of what you want built, and the agent handles everything:
- Planning -- create project, idea, self-elaboration, proposal with docs & tasks
- Proposal Review -- proposal-reviewer adversarial loop
- Execution -- wave-based parallel task dispatch via
spawn_agent - Verification -- task-reviewer adversarial loop + admin verify
- Report -- completion summary
/yolo <prompt>
|
v
Project + Idea + Elaboration + Proposal
|
v
Proposal Reviewer (auto, up to maxProposalReviewRounds)
|
v
Admin Approve --> Tasks materialize
|
v
Wave-based spawn_agent parallel execution
| (dev agent + task-reviewer per task)
v
Admin Verify each wave --> unblock next
|
v
Done. Report summary.
Escape hatch: Ctrl+C at any time. All created entities (project, idea, proposal, tasks) persist in Chorus. Resume manually via /develop or /review.
Prerequisites
The API key needs write + admin on every resource it touches:
| Needs | Why |
|---|---|
idea: [write] |
Create ideas, run elaboration |
proposal: [write, admin] |
Create proposals; approve them |
task: [write, admin] |
Create, execute, verify tasks |
project: [write] |
Create the project if none is given |
Check at startup:
perms = chorus_checkin().agent.permissions
need = { idea: ["write"], proposal: ["write","admin"],
task: ["write","admin"], project: ["write"] }
for resource, actions in need:
missing = [a for a in actions if a not in (perms[resource] or [])]
if missing: ABORT "/yolo needs {resource}: {missing}. Use an Admin-preset API key."
Input
/yolo <natural language prompt>
/yolo <prompt> --project <project-uuid>
<prompt>-- what you want built (becomes the Idea content)--project <uuid>-- optional; use an existing project instead of creating a new one
Workflow
Phase 1: Planning
Step 1.1: Resolve Project
Parse the arguments for --project <uuid>.
If --project is provided:
chorus_get_project({ projectUuid: "<uuid>" })
Verify it exists and proceed.
If not provided, search for a suitable existing project first:
# 1. Search for projects matching the prompt topic
chorus_search({ query: "<key terms from prompt>", entityTypes: ["project"] })
# 2. Or list recent projects to find a match
chorus_list_projects()
Review the results. If a project clearly matches the user's intent (same topic, active, relevant scope), use it. If no suitable project exists, create a new one:
chorus_admin_create_project({
name: "<short title derived from prompt>",
description: "<1-2 sentence summary of the prompt>"
})
Step 1.2: Create Idea
chorus_pm_create_idea({
projectUuid: "<project-uuid>",
title: "<concise title derived from prompt>",
content: "<full user prompt as-is>"
})
Then claim it:
chorus_claim_idea({ ideaUuid: "<idea-uuid>" })
Step 1.3: Self-Elaboration
In /yolo mode, the agent generates elaboration questions and answers them itself -- no AskUserQuestion calls. This preserves an audit trail without interrupting the user.
Self-elaboration is still a loop. If answering your own questions surfaces a new question, contradiction, or gap, loop back to
chorus_pm_start_elaborationfor another self-answered round before resolving — don't force a resolve over unresolved ambiguity. There is no human gate in YOLO, so the loop exits on your judgment that nothing material is left open (round cap 10). Steps 1–2 are one round; repeat them as needed, then resolve once in Step 3.
Generate and submit questions:
chorus_pm_start_elaboration({ ideaUuid: "<idea-uuid>", depth: "standard", questions: [ { id: "q1", text: "<question about scope, architecture, etc.>", category: "functional", options: [ { id: "a", label: "<option A>" }, { id: "b", label: "<option B>" } ] } // ... 5-8 questions covering functional, technical, scope aspects ] })Answer immediately (agent selects best options based on the prompt):
chorus_answer_elaboration({ ideaUuid: "<idea-uuid>", roundUuid: "<round-uuid>", answers: [ { questionId: "q1", selectedOptionId: "a", customText: "Rationale: ..." }, // ... ] })Resolve — in YOLO mode the agent resolves elaboration autonomously, with no human-confirmation gate (the human-confirmation requirement that applies to the interactive
/ideaflow is explicitly waived under/yoloautomation):chorus_pm_validate_elaboration({ ideaUuid: "<idea-uuid>" })chorus_pm_validate_elaborationrequiresidea:admin./yoloalready mandates an Admin-preset key in Prerequisites, so this is satisfied. To open another self-elaboration round instead of resolving, just callchorus_pm_start_elaborationagain.
Step 1.4: Create Proposal
Detect OpenSpec mode. Load the
openspec-awareskill at~/.codex/skills/openspec-aware/SKILL.mdand run its §1 detection contract. The result determines how the rest of this step authors documents:CHORUS_OPENSPEC_ACTIVE=1→ spec-driven branch (sub-step 2a below).CHORUS_OPENSPEC_ACTIVE=0→ free-form branch (sub-step 2b below).
This is mandatory — yolo runs unattended, so silently picking the wrong mode is exactly the failure scenario the detection contract exists to prevent.
Create the empty proposal container. In OpenSpec mode, the
descriptionMUST contain the literal lineOpenSpec change slug: <slug>(use the$SLUGyou'll pick in 2a); in free-form mode, omit that line.chorus_pm_create_proposal({ projectUuid: "<project-uuid>", title: "<feature name>", description: "<summary>\n\nOpenSpec change slug: <slug>", // OpenSpec mode // description: "<summary>", // free-form mode inputType: "idea", inputUuids: ["<idea-uuid>"] })Then branch:
2a. OpenSpec mode (
CHORUS_OPENSPEC_ACTIVE=1). Followopenspec-aware§3 end-to-end:- Pick
$SLUG, runopenspec new change "$SLUG"(§3.1–§3.2). - Author
proposal.md,design.md, and onespecs/<capability>/spec.mdper capability locally on disk (§3.3). ADDED Requirements only; per-spec fallback to free-form Markdown if MODIFIED/REMOVED is needed. - Define
$API,json_encode_file,chorus_check_responsehelpers (§3.4, §6). - Mirror each local file via
"$API" chorus_pm_add_document_draft "$PAYLOAD"(§3.6) — one call per file, with the document type fromopenspec-aware§5. (Codex'schorus-mcp-call.shtakes<TOOL_NAME> <JSON>directly; nomcp-toolsubcommand.)
⛔ Do not invoke
chorus_pm_add_document_draft/chorus_pm_update_document_draft/chorus_pm_update_documentfrom Codex's MCP harness with a hand-typedcontentfield in this branch. Re-typing the markdown body wastes 20k+ tokens per proposal and breaks byte-equality with the local files. Seeopenspec-aware§2 Rule 1.Then continue to step 3 (task drafts).
2b. Free-form mode (
CHORUS_OPENSPEC_ACTIVE=0). Add a tech design document draft directly via MCP, content authored inline:chorus_pm_add_document_draft({ proposalUuid: "<proposal-uuid>", type: "tech_design", title: "Tech Design: <feature>", content: "<markdown tech design covering architecture, data model, API, module contracts>" })- Pick
Add task drafts incrementally (use returned
draftUuidfor dependency chaining).acceptanceCriteriaItemsis required on every draft — at least one non-blank criterion, or the call is rejected:# First task result1 = chorus_pm_add_task_draft({ proposalUuid: "<proposal-uuid>", title: "<module name>", description: "<what to build, referencing tech design>", priority: "high", storyPoints: 3, acceptanceCriteriaItems: [ { description: "<testable criterion>", required: true }, // ... ] }) # Second task, depends on first chorus_pm_add_task_draft({ proposalUuid: "<proposal-uuid>", title: "<dependent module>", description: "...", priority: "medium", storyPoints: 2, acceptanceCriteriaItems: [...], dependsOnDraftUuids: ["<result1.draftUuid>"] })Validate:
chorus_pm_validate_proposal({ proposalUuid: "<proposal-uuid>" })Fix any errors, then proceed.
Submit:
chorus_pm_submit_proposal({ proposalUuid: "<proposal-uuid>" })After this call, the PostToolUse hook injects context instructing you to spawn the
chorus-proposal-reviewersub-agent. You MUST spawn it yourself viaspawn_agentand wait for its return withwait_agent— it is NOT auto-launched.
Phase 2: Proposal Review Loop
After chorus_pm_submit_proposal, the PostToolUse hook injects context instructing you to spawn the chorus-proposal-reviewer sub-agent. The reviewer is a SKILL, not a built-in agent_type — spawn it by mounting the skill into a default agent:
spawn_agent(
agent_type="default",
items=[
{ type: "skill", name: "Chorus Proposal Reviewer", path: "chorus:chorus-proposal-reviewer" },
{ type: "text", text: "Review proposal <proposal-uuid>. Max review rounds: 3. Post VERDICT comment." }
]
)
wait_agent([reviewer_id])
Then:
Read the reviewer's VERDICT:
chorus_get_comments({ targetType: "proposal", targetUuid: "<proposal-uuid>" })Look for the most recent comment containing
VERDICT:.IMPORTANT — release thread slot: after
wait_agentreturns, immediately callclose_agent(reviewer_id). Codex caps concurrent agent threads at 6;completedstatus does NOT free a slot — onlyclose_agentdoes. On long$yoloruns you WILL hit the limit if you don't close each reviewer after use.Act on the VERDICT:
PASS or PASS WITH NOTES --
chorus_admin_approve_proposal({ proposalUuid: "<proposal-uuid>", reviewNote: "PASS from reviewer. <brief summary of notes if any>" })Tasks and documents materialize automatically. Proceed to Phase 3.
FAIL -- Read the BLOCKERs from the reviewer comment. Then:
chorus_pm_reject_proposal({ proposalUuid: "<proposal-uuid>", reviewNote: "FAIL from reviewer. Fixing BLOCKERs: <list>" })Revise the drafts (
chorus_pm_update_document_draft,chorus_pm_update_task_draft) to address each BLOCKER, then resubmit:chorus_pm_submit_proposal({ proposalUuid: "<proposal-uuid>" })After resubmission, the hook injects context again — spawn the reviewer yourself for Round 2.
Max rounds: Loop up to
maxProposalReviewRounds(from plugin config, default 3). If exhausted:STOP: "Proposal review failed after {maxRounds} rounds. Remaining BLOCKERs: <list>. Human review needed. Proposal UUID: <uuid>"No new VERDICT comment after reviewer returns? The reviewer exhausted its
maxTurnsbudget. Respawn it ONCE with a concise-budget hint: "Stay within turn budget. Skip deep source verification. Fetch proposal + comments + idea only, skim for obvious BLOCKERs, and post your VERDICT within the first 10 turns." If the second attempt still produces no VERDICT, treat the proposal as PASS WITH NOTES and proceed — the pipeline cannot loop forever on a silent reviewer.
Phase 3: Task Execution (Wave-Based)
After proposal approval, tasks exist in open status. Execute them in dependency-ordered waves using Codex spawn_agent. If parallel spawn is not desired or too many workers in flight, fall back to sequential main-agent execution.
Primary: Parallel spawn_agent workers
wave = 1
loop:
# 1. Find ready tasks
unblocked = chorus_get_unblocked_tasks({ projectUuid: "<project-uuid>" })
if no unblocked tasks and all tasks done:
break # All complete
if no unblocked tasks and some tasks not done:
# Stuck -- tasks failed review and can't proceed
break with escalation report
# 2. For each unblocked task, spawn a worker
for each task in unblocked:
# Optional: create a Chorus session for observability
session = chorus_create_session({ name: f"worker-{task.title[:20]}" })
spawn_agent(
agent_type="worker",
message=f"""You are a Chorus developer worker. Follow the $develop skill.
Your sessionUuid: {session.uuid} # omit this line if no session
Your task UUID: {task.uuid}
Project UUID: {project_uuid}
Implement per task description + acceptance criteria. Read task, proposal, and project documents for context. After chorus_submit_for_verify, exit and let the main agent spawn the task-reviewer."""
)
# 3. Wait for workers to return (use wait_agent)
# Each worker follows $develop skill:
# claim -> in_progress -> develop -> report -> self-check AC -> submit_for_verify
# 4. Close worker sessions (main agent responsibility until the Codex plugin wires SubagentStop cleanup)
for each session:
chorus_close_session({ sessionUuid: session.uuid })
# 5. Proceed to Phase 4 (verification) for this wave
wave += 1
What the worker prompt needs:
taskUuid(required)sessionUuid(optional — only if main agent created one for observability)projectUuid(required for context lookups)- Explicit instruction to follow
$developskill — the skill itself has all the workflow detail
Fallback: Main Agent (sequential)
If parallel spawn is not practical (rate limits, token budget, or simpler debugging wanted), fall back to executing tasks sequentially as the main agent:
for each task in unblocked:
# Follow the /develop workflow directly as main agent
chorus_claim_task({ taskUuid: "<task-uuid>" })
chorus_update_task({ taskUuid: "<task-uuid>", status: "in_progress" })
# ... implement the task: read context, write code, run tests ...
chorus_report_work({ taskUuid: "<task-uuid>", report: "..." })
chorus_report_criteria_self_check({ taskUuid: "<task-uuid>", criteria: [...] })
chorus_submit_for_verify({ taskUuid: "<task-uuid>", summary: "..." })
# PostToolUse hook injects context — you must spawn task-reviewer yourself
# Proceed to Phase 4 verification for this task before moving to next
The fallback is slower (sequential, not parallel) but still completes the pipeline. The PostToolUse hook injects reviewer instructions the same way in both modes — you must always spawn the reviewer manually.
Phase 4: Verification
After each wave's sub-agents complete, verify their tasks:
for each task in wave_tasks:
# 1. Check task status
task = chorus_get_task({ taskUuid: "<task-uuid>" })
if task.status != "to_verify":
# Sub-agent may have failed; skip or handle
continue
# 2. Spawn task-reviewer in FOREGROUND and wait for it (use wait_agent)
# Mount the chorus-task-reviewer SKILL into a default sub-agent
# (Codex only has default/explorer/worker built-in types).
spawn_agent(
agent_type="default",
items=[
{ type: "skill", name: "Chorus Task Reviewer", path: "chorus:chorus-task-reviewer" },
{ type: "text", text: "Review Chorus task <task-uuid>. Post VERDICT as a comment before exit." }
]
)
wait_agent([reviewer_id])
close_agent(reviewer_id) # IMPORTANT: release the thread slot (max 6 concurrent, completed != closed)
# 3. Read task-reviewer VERDICT
comments = chorus_get_comments({ targetType: "task", targetUuid: "<task-uuid>" })
# Find the most recent comment containing "VERDICT:"
# 4. Act on VERDICT — three possible outcomes:
if VERDICT is "PASS":
# All AC verified, no issues. Mark AC and verify.
chorus_mark_acceptance_criteria({
taskUuid: "<task-uuid>",
criteria: [
{ uuid: "<ac-uuid>", status: "passed", evidence: "<from reviewer>" },
// ...
]
})
chorus_admin_verify_task({ taskUuid: "<task-uuid>" })
# Task is now "done" -- unblocks dependents
if VERDICT is "PASS WITH NOTES":
# All AC verified, minor non-blocking notes. Still mark AC and verify.
chorus_mark_acceptance_criteria({ ... })
chorus_admin_verify_task({ taskUuid: "<task-uuid>" })
if VERDICT is "FAIL":
# BLOCKERs found. Do NOT verify. Reopen for rework.
chorus_admin_reopen_task({ taskUuid: "<task-uuid>" })
# Task returns to "open", will be picked up in next wave
After verifying all tasks in the wave, return to Phase 3 to check for newly unblocked tasks.
Max rounds per task: Tracked by maxTaskReviewRounds from plugin config (default 3). If a task has been reopened maxRounds times, skip it and flag for human escalation:
ESCALATE: "Task '{title}' failed review after {maxRounds} rounds.
Last BLOCKERs: <list>. Manual intervention needed.
Task UUID: <uuid>"
Continue with remaining tasks -- do not halt the entire pipeline for one stuck task.
No new VERDICT comment after the task-reviewer returns? It exhausted its maxTurns budget. Respawn it ONCE with a concise-budget hint: "Stay within turn budget. Skip deep verification. Fetch task/proposal/comments, run only the core tests, and post your VERDICT within the first 12 turns." If the second attempt also produces no VERDICT, treat as PASS WITH NOTES and proceed — do not loop indefinitely.
Phase 5: Report
After all waves complete, output a markdown summary:
## /yolo Complete
**Project:** <project-name> (<project-uuid>)
**Proposal:** <proposal-title> (<proposal-uuid>)
**Idea:** <idea-title> (<idea-uuid>)
### Tasks
| Task | Status | Review Rounds |
|------|--------|---------------|
| <title> | done | 1 |
| <title> | done | 2 |
| <title> | ESCALATED | 3 (max) |
### Summary
- Total tasks: N
- Completed: X / N
- Escalated: Y (need human review)
- Waves executed: W
Phase 5b: Idea Completion Report (mandatory)
A successful $yolo run always finishes the Idea — call chorus_create_report once with proposalUuid set to the last verified proposal. The tool's description carries the section template; follow it. Surface the returned documentUuid in the Phase 5 summary. Skipping is a protocol violation.
Error Handling
| Scenario | Action |
|---|---|
| Missing permissions at startup | Abort with message listing the missing resource/action pairs (see Prerequisites). Recommend an Admin-preset API key. |
| Project creation fails | Report error, suggest user create project manually and retry with --project |
| Proposal reviewer FAIL after maxRounds | Stop pipeline, report persisting BLOCKERs, suggest manual review |
| Task reviewer FAIL after maxRounds | Flag task as escalation-needed, continue with other tasks |
| Sub-agent crash / no submit | Log error, skip task, pick it up in next wave if possible |
| Ctrl+C | All entities persist in Chorus. User can resume via /develop or /review |
Tips
- Keep the initial prompt detailed -- the more context you provide, the better the auto-generated proposal quality
- The proposal-reviewer is your quality gate -- if it keeps FAILing, the prompt may be too vague
- Watch the wave count -- if tasks keep getting reopened, consider Ctrl+C and manually reviewing the feedback
- All audit trail is preserved: elaboration Q&A, reviewer VERDICTs, work reports. Check Chorus UI for full history
- For small/simple tasks, consider
/quick-devinstead -- it skips the Idea->Proposal overhead - Sub-agents share your API key; ensure it has the permissions listed in Prerequisites before starting
Next
- To manually review proposals:
/review - To manually develop tasks:
/develop - To create quick standalone tasks:
/quick-dev - For platform overview:
/chorus