orchestration-patterns

star 66

Agentic orchestration patterns for long-running tasks. Implements evidence-based delivery and iterative agent loops. Use when managing multi-step work, coordinating workflows, or orchestrating PR workflows.

bybren-llc By bybren-llc schedule Updated 3/7/2026

name: orchestration-patterns description: Agentic orchestration patterns for long-running tasks. Implements evidence-based delivery and iterative agent loops. Use when managing multi-step work, coordinating workflows, or orchestrating PR workflows.

Orchestration Patterns Skill

Purpose

Codify evidence-based delivery and iterative agent loop for orchestrating complex, long-running tasks. These patterns ensure verifiable progress and intelligent escalation.

When This Skill Applies

  • Orchestrating multi-step implementation tasks
  • Managing work across multiple steps
  • Running long-running sessions that need checkpoints
  • Preparing PRs for merge (mandatory QA gate)
  • Coordinating team handoffs

The Agent Loop

Core Philosophy: "Iterate until success or blocked, then escalate."

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  THE AGENT LOOP (for every task)                        │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│                                                         │
│  1. GOAL DEFINITION                                     │
│     └─ Clear acceptance criteria (from spec/ticket)     │
│                                                         │
│  2. PATTERN DISCOVERY                                   │
│     └─ Search codebase, docs, previous sessions         │
│     └─ Use: pattern-discovery skill (auto-invoked)      │
│     └─ Or: /search-pattern for explicit code search     │
│                                                         │
│  3. ITERATIVE EXECUTION LOOP:                           │
│     ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐     │
│     │  Implement approach                         │     │
│     │       ↓                                     │     │
│     │  Run validation (yarn ci:validate)          │     │
│     │       ↓                                     │     │
│     │  If PASS → proceed to evidence              │     │
│     │  If FAIL → analyze error, adjust, repeat    │     │
│     │  If BLOCKED → escalate with context         │     │
│     └─────────────────────────────────────────────┘     │
│                                                         │
│  4. EVIDENCE ATTACHMENT                                 │
│     └─ Attach proof to Linear (see templates below)     │
│                                                         │
│  5. QA GATE (MANDATORY before merge)                    │
│     └─ Independent review of PR                         │
│                                                         │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Evidence-Based Delivery

Core Principle: "All work requires verifiable evidence - no 'trust me, it works'"

Evidence Types

Type What It Proves Example
Test Results Code works as expected yarn ci:validate output
Screenshots UI changes are correct Before/after comparison
Command Output Operations completed Build logs, migration logs
QA Report Independent verification QA validation markdown
Session ID Full audit trail available Session reference

Phase Evidence Requirements

Phase Evidence Required Linear Template
Dev Test results, command output Dev Evidence Template
Staging UAT validation or N/A + reason Staging Template
Done QA report, merge confirmation Done Evidence Template

QA Pre-Merge Gate

MANDATORY: Before merging any PR, perform independent review.

Why QA Gate Matters

  1. Separation of Concerns: QA validates but doesn't write product code
  2. Independent Verification: Catches what implementer missed
  3. Bias Prevention: Fresh eyes on commit messages, patterns
  4. Evidence in Linear: QA posts final evidence + verdict to Linear (system of record)

QA Review Checklist

## QA Review - PR #XXX for {{TICKET_PREFIX}}-YYY

### Commit Message Validation
- [ ] Ticket reference in subject line
- [ ] Proper format: `type(scope): description [{{TICKET_PREFIX}}-XXX]`

### Code Pattern Validation
- [ ] RLS context helpers used (no direct Prisma)
- [ ] Naming conventions followed
- [ ] File structure matches patterns

### CI Status
- [ ] All checks passing
- [ ] No new lint warnings

### Evidence Verification
- [ ] Dev evidence attached to Linear
- [ ] Acceptance criteria addressed

### Verdict
- [ ] APPROVED for merge
- [ ] CHANGES REQUESTED (list below)

QA Output Location

All QA reports go to: docs/agent-outputs/qa-validations/{{TICKET_PREFIX}}-{number}-qa-validation.md

Escalation Patterns

When to Escalate

Condition Escalate To Include
Blocked > 4 hours TDM Full context, attempts made
Architecture ambiguity ARCHitect Options, trade-offs
Cross-team dependency TDM Which teams, what's blocked
Security concern SecEng Specific risk, evidence

Escalation Template

**Escalation Required**

**Blocked On**: [specific blocker]
**Attempts Made**:

1. [what you tried]
2. [what you tried]

**Context**:

- Ticket: {{TICKET_PREFIX}}-XXX
- Session ID: [if available]
- Time blocked: X hours

**Request**: [specific ask - what do you need?]

Long-Running Task Checkpoints

For tasks spanning multiple steps or sessions:

Checkpoint Pattern

Every 10-15 steps:
1. Update progress with current state
2. If nearing limits, summarize state
3. If handoff needed, provide continuation context

At session boundaries:
1. Summarize completed work
2. List remaining items
3. Document any blockers
4. Attach evidence to Linear

State Preservation

**Session Checkpoint**

**Completed**:

- [x] Task 1
- [x] Task 2

**In Progress**:

- [ ] Task 3 (at step X)

**Remaining**:

- [ ] Task 4
- [ ] Task 5

**Blockers**: [if any]

**Next Action**: [specific next step]

Orchestration Workflow Example

# Complete workflow for feature implementation:

1. /start-work {{TICKET_PREFIX}}-XXX
   └─ Syncs to main, creates branch, sets context

2. Pattern discovery (skill auto-invokes or use /search-pattern)
   └─ Finds relevant patterns before implementation

3. [Implementation with agent loop]
   ├─ Implement
   ├─ Validate (yarn ci:validate)
   ├─ Adjust if needed
   └─ Repeat until passing

4. /pre-pr
   └─ Full validation checklist

5. Create PR with evidence

6. [QA GATE - MANDATORY]
   └─ Perform QA review
   └─ Fix any blocking issues
   └─ Commit QA report

7. Merge (only after QA approval)

8. /end-work
   └─ Updates Linear, cleans up

Reference

  • AGENT_WORKFLOW_SOP.md: Full agent workflow documentation
  • CONTRIBUTING.md: Workflow requirements
  • linear-sop skill: Evidence templates for Linear

Anti-Patterns to Avoid

Anti-Pattern Why It's Bad Do This Instead
Skip QA review Miss commit message issues Always perform QA pre-merge
No evidence in Linear No audit trail Attach evidence every phase
Ignore CI failures Broken code reaches main Fix in agent loop, don't skip
Force-push without check May lose teammate's changes Use --force-with-lease
Continue when blocked Waste time, no progress Escalate with context
Install via CLI
npx skills add https://github.com/bybren-llc/safe-agentic-workflow --skill orchestration-patterns
Repository Details
star Stars 66
call_split Forks 16
navigation Branch main
article Path SKILL.md
More from Creator