jbf-workflow

star 39

Use when routing a Journal of Banking & Finance (JBF) manuscript to the right JBF sub-skill across the lifecycle — topic fit, literature positioning, identification, bank-panel data work, exhibits, Elsevier Editorial Manager submission, double-anonymized review, and R&R rebuttal strategy.

brycewang-stanford By brycewang-stanford schedule Updated 6/10/2026

name: jbf-workflow description: Use when routing a Journal of Banking & Finance (JBF) manuscript to the right JBF sub-skill across the lifecycle — topic fit, literature positioning, identification, bank-panel data work, exhibits, Elsevier Editorial Manager submission, double-anonymized review, and R&R rebuttal strategy.

JBF Workflow Router (jbf-workflow)

Use this skill to decide which JBF sub-skill to invoke next for a Journal of Banking & Finance manuscript. JBF is an Elsevier journal (est. 1977, monthly, ISSN 0378-4266) for empirical and theoretical research on banking, financial intermediation, financial institutions, capital markets, investments, corporate finance, and financial regulation — with a strong empirical, bank-focused orientation. This pack is tuned to that nature, not to generic finance writing.

Default order

  1. jbf-topic-selection — is the question a fit for a bank/intermediation-focused finance journal?
  2. jbf-literature-positioning — stake the contribution against the banking/finance frontier.
  3. jbf-identification-strategy — credible causal/empirical design for this field (bank panels, policy shocks, IV, event studies).
  4. jbf-data-analysis — sample construction, estimation, and the robustness JBF referees expect.
  5. jbf-tables-figures — clear exhibits with self-contained notes.
  6. jbf-contribution-framing — make the "so what" land for banking/finance readers and policy audiences.
  7. jbf-writing-style — concise, results-forward prose plus numbered-reference readiness.
  8. jbf-replication-and-data-policy — Elsevier Option C data statement plus deposit/link-or-explain package.
  9. jbf-review-process — what double-anonymized review and the desk screen involve.
  10. jbf-submission — Editorial Manager preflight: USD 350 fee, anonymized manuscript + title page, 250-word abstract, keywords, Highlights, AI declaration, data statement.
  11. jbf-rebuttal — response-letter strategy for an R&R.

Quick routing

  • Brand-new idea → jbf-topic-selection
  • "Why JBF over a top-3 finance journal?" → jbf-contribution-framing
  • Worried about endogeneity in a bank panel → jbf-identification-strategy
  • Submitting this week → jbf-submission (then jbf-review-process)
  • Got an R&R → jbf-rebuttal

Verify volatile specifics (fee, editor roster, special-issue instructions) on the official ScienceDirect Guide for Authors — see resources/official-source-map.md.

Router diagnostics

  • Scope is generic finance, not banking/intermediation -> jbf-topic-selection.
  • Endogeneity or bank-panel design is weak -> jbf-identification-strategy.
  • Licensed-data path is not reproducible -> jbf-replication-and-data-policy.
  • Tables omit units, clustering, or economic magnitudes -> jbf-tables-figures.
  • Results read as significance-only -> jbf-writing-style.

Stage gates for a JBF lifecycle

Place the manuscript at a gate before routing; do not advance until the exit condition holds.

Gate Exit condition Skill
G0 idea question names a bank/intermediation/regulation margin, not "finance in country X" jbf-topic-selection
G1 positioning closest intermediation-strand papers named with a stated delta jbf-literature-positioning
G2 design identifying variation survives the "regulation is endogenous" objection jbf-identification-strategy
G3 pipeline bank-panel sample, filters, and clustering documented end to end jbf-data-analysis
G4 exhibits baseline → identification → mechanism tables with self-contained notes jbf-tables-figures
G5 narrative contribution lands in finance units and policy terms without overreach jbf-contribution-framing, jbf-writing-style
G6 package data statement plus Editorial Manager preflight complete jbf-replication-and-data-policy, jbf-submission
G7 decision status interpreted; R&R triaged jbf-review-process, jbf-rebuttal

Illustrative routing pass

A draft asks whether the Basel III liquidity coverage ratio shifted bank lending toward short maturities, using a bank-quarter Call Reports panel.

  • The question is squarely bank-regulatory, so G0 passes without rerouting.
  • The introduction cites a broad liquidity literature but no closest paper on the LCR and credit supply — route to jbf-literature-positioning.
  • Identification leans on plain TWFE around a single adoption date with no untreated banks; jbf-identification-strategy flags the missing size-threshold contrast (the rule binds for large banks first) before any table work starts.
  • Only after G2 holds does the pipeline-to-exhibit chain (jbf-data-analysisjbf-tables-figures) begin; running it earlier wastes a robustness battery on a design that will change.

Common misroutes

  • Sending an R&R straight to jbf-writing-style: triage with jbf-rebuttal first — prose fixes cannot answer identification comments.
  • Building exhibits before G2 holds: staggered-DID corrections re-cut every table.
  • Treating the data statement as submission-day paperwork: licensed bank-data documentation starts at G3, not G6.
  • Pitching breadth ("banking and markets and fintech"): JBF rewards one anchored intermediation margin per paper.

Routing output

[Gate] G0-G7 position
[Blocking symptom] ...
[Route] jbf-... sub-skill
[Re-entry check] which gate to re-test after the fix
[Volatile facts] fee / editor roster / calls — re-verify via official-source-map
Install via CLI
npx skills add https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jbf-workflow
Repository Details
star Stars 39
call_split Forks 11
navigation Branch main
article Path SKILL.md
More from Creator
brycewang-stanford
brycewang-stanford Explore all skills →