By name: fact-verification description: Verify scientific claims, political statements, and environmental assertions against evidence
Fact Verification
Purpose
Systematically verify factual claims using evidence retrieval, source evaluation, and logical reasoning.
Key Datasets
- PolitiFact (Jinyan1/PolitiFact): Political statements rated on 6-level truth scale (True, Mostly True, Half True, Mostly False, False, Pants on Fire)
- Climate-FEVER (tdiggelm/climate_fever): Climate claims labeled SUPPORTS/REFUTES/NOT_ENOUGH_INFO with evidence sentences
Protocol
- Claim decomposition — Break complex claims into atomic verifiable statements
- Evidence retrieval — Search authoritative sources for each sub-claim
- Source evaluation — Assess source credibility and potential bias
- Evidence-claim alignment — Determine if evidence supports, refutes, or is insufficient
- Verdict synthesis — Aggregate sub-verdicts into overall assessment
Verification Categories
- Scientific claims: Published findings, statistical assertions, causal claims
- Political statements: Policy claims, historical assertions, statistical citations
- Environmental claims: Climate data, pollution metrics, biodiversity assertions
- Health claims: Treatment efficacy, risk factors, epidemiological data
Verdict Scale
- VERIFIED: Multiple independent high-quality sources confirm
- LIKELY TRUE: Evidence supports but limited independent confirmation
- MIXED: Partially true with important caveats or context
- LIKELY FALSE: Evidence contradicts but some ambiguity remains
- FALSE: Clear evidence contradicts the claim
- UNVERIFIABLE: Insufficient evidence to determine
Rules
- Always cite specific evidence for each verdict
- Distinguish between factual errors and misleading framing
- Check for cherry-picked statistics or out-of-context quotes
- Consider temporal context (claim may have been true when made)