vllm-sota-humanize-loop - SKILL.md Agent Skill

name: vllm-sota-humanize-loop description: "Run an autonomous Humanize-governed vLLM SOTA performance loop for one LLM model: first perform the fixed fair vLLM/SGLang/TensorRT-LLM deployment search and benchmark, then start one RLCR loop that repeatedly decides the gap, profiles the current bottleneck, runs layer/kernel pipeline analysis, patches vLLM code, optionally uses ncu-report-skill for kernel evidence, and revalidates until vLLM matches or beats the best observed framework under the same workload and SLA."

vLLM SOTA Humanize Loop

Overview

Use this skill when the user names a model and wants the vLLM serving path to autonomously keep improving until it matches or beats the best reproducible SGLang or TensorRT-LLM result in the same target environment.

This workflow has two durable parts:

A fixed baseline phase that must be completed once before any code patching.
One Humanize RLCR loop that owns gap decision, profiling, required layer/kernel deep dive, vLLM patching, optional NCU evidence, and real-model revalidation.

Do not split the campaign into a pre-loop profiling phase plus a later patch loop. After the fixed benchmark exists, Phase 2 gap decisions, Phase 3 profiling, llm-pipeline-analysis, kernel evidence, and code changes all belong inside the same model-level RLCR loop.

Runtime Roots

This skill can run from Claude Code, Codex, or another compatible skill runtime. Resolve companion roots in this order:

Prefer installed Claude Code skills under ~/.claude/skills when running in Claude Code.
Prefer installed Codex skills under ${CODEX_HOME:-~/.codex}/skills when running in Codex.
Fall back to checked-out repositories when the skills are symlinked or kept local for development.

Example local paths:

Humanize runtime: ${CODEX_HOME:-~/.codex}/skills/humanize
ncu-report-skill: ${CODEX_HOME:-~/.codex}/skills/ncu-report-skill/SKILL.md
Model PR history knowledge: <repo>/model-pr-optimization-history

For Claude Code installs, the equivalent defaults are typically:

Humanize runtime: ~/.claude/skills/humanize
ncu-report-skill: ~/.claude/skills/ncu-report-skill/SKILL.md
Model PR history knowledge: ~/.claude/skills/model-pr-history-knowledge

If the Humanize runtime is missing, locate a plugin or skill directory containing scripts/setup-rlcr-loop.sh. If ncu-report-skill is unavailable, kernel edits may still proceed from torch-profiler/source evidence, but record the missing NCU evidence path as a blocker when a kernel change would normally need Nsight Compute diagnostics.

Companion Skills

Read these before a real run:

../llm-serving-auto-benchmark/SKILL.md
../llm-torch-profiler-analysis/SKILL.md
../llm-pipeline-analysis/SKILL.md
../../model-pr-optimization-history/SKILL.md
the matching host or operator skill for SSH, container, GPU, and artifact conventions

Read ncu-report-skill/SKILL.md only when the active RLCR round is writing or evaluating a CUDA, Triton, CuTe, CUTLASS, TileLang, or torch.compile kernel path and Nsight Compute evidence is needed.

Contract

Given a model-level vLLM SOTA request, do not ask the user to run separate benchmark, profiler, gen-plan, refine-plan, or Humanize setup commands. Do the setup yourself.

Ask the user only if the model, target GPU environment, or precision/quantization policy is missing and cannot be inferred from local configs or the active host skill.

Keep only the fixed benchmark phase outside the RLCR patch loop. Once the fixed cross-framework benchmark and model PR history notes exist, start Humanize. The RLCR loop itself must decide whether a gap still exists, collect current profiler evidence, run layer pipeline analysis, patch vLLM, and revalidate.

Treat the model optimization campaign as the durable unit, not one terminal session. The campaign is recoverable from the run artifact root, checkpoint files, benchmark/profile artifacts, NCU digests, and ledgers.

Phase 0: Inputs And Run Directory

Collect or infer:

model id or checkpoint path, tokenizer, precision, quantization, trust policy, and max context length
target vLLM checkout to patch
GPU type/count, visible GPU ids, container or remote shell, CUDA/NCCL versions, and whether multi-node is allowed
framework set, defaulting to vLLM, SGLang, and TensorRT-LLM when available
model-family history slug inferred from the model id, checkpoint, or hot vLLM/SGLang source path when possible
artifact root

Create one run directory:

runs/YYYYMMDD_<model_slug>_sota_humanize/
  manifest.md
  help/
  benchmark/
  profiles/
  analysis/
    root-cause.md
    layer-pipeline.md
  history/
    model-pr-history-notes.md
  kernel/
    ncu-digests/
  patches/
  humanize/
    model-loop-checkpoint.md
  final_report.md

Never save Hugging Face tokens or other secrets in artifacts.

Phase 0.5: Model PR History Knowledge Gate

Before the fixed benchmark and before any patch planning, query and read model-pr-optimization-history for the target model family.

Rules:

If the slug is unclear, run scripts/query.py "<model id or family>" from the knowledge root and choose the closest model-family history.
Read the vLLM history for that family whenever it exists.
Read the SGLang history too when SGLang is in the comparison set, later becomes the leading competitor, or its source/trace suggests a missing vLLM fast path.
Write history/model-pr-history-notes.md with the paths read, PR numbers, source files, symbols, validation risks, and the concrete decision each item influences.
Treat these notes as source and PR memory that helps choose a better vLLM patch, not measured proof by itself.

If the knowledge root is unavailable, record the blocker in the same notes file and continue with benchmark/profile evidence.

Phase 1: Fixed Fair Benchmark Gate

This phase is mandatory and happens exactly once before Humanize starts.

Use llm-serving-auto-benchmark as the source of truth for candidate generation, result schema, workload, and comparison.

Hard requirements:

Search vLLM, SGLang, and TensorRT-LLM best deployment commands when each framework is supported in the target environment.
Do not compare tuned vLLM against competitor defaults. Every framework gets its own bounded search.
Use the same model weights, tokenizer, precision, quantization, GPU type/count, GPU ids, endpoint path, sampling settings, and SLA.
Use the default two dataset scenarios from llm-serving-auto-benchmark unless the user explicitly provides a production workload:
- dataset kind random, num_prompts: 80
- chat: random input 1000, output 1000
- summarization: random input 8000, output 1000
- treat the two input/output pairs as aligned scenarios, not a cartesian product
Do not replace those scenarios with an easier smoke dataset for the real SOTA decision. Smoke runs are allowed only when labeled as flow checks.
For TensorRT-LLM, keep trtllm-serve serve --backend pytorch; reject non-PyTorch TensorRT-LLM server backends for this skill.
Keep failed, skipped, and SLA-failing candidates in the benchmark artifact.

Write:

benchmark/candidates.jsonl
benchmark/summary.md
benchmark/winning-commands.md
framework help outputs under help/
the exact launch and benchmark commands for every winner

Do not choose a code patch outside RLCR. The fixed winner table is the baseline input to the model loop.

Phase 2: Build The Humanize Plan

Create a Humanize plan inside the vLLM checkout that will be patched:

.humanize/vllm-sota-agent/refined-plan.md

Use references/refined-plan-template.md as the skeleton and fill it with the actual model, workload, benchmark winners, artifact root, model PR history notes, and target vLLM checkout.

The plan must require every RLCR round to:

preserve the fixed benchmark workload and SLA
preserve and consult history/model-pr-history-notes.md before choosing model-specific vLLM source paths
run the gap decision inside the loop before patching
run llm-torch-profiler-analysis inside the loop when vLLM is behind or when the previous patch changed the profiled path
run llm-pipeline-analysis inside the loop after profiler triage and before choosing a source path, representative layer, or kernel target
patch vLLM code, not just benchmark parameters
use ncu-report-skill inside the same loop when a kernel edit needs Nsight Compute evidence
re-run real model benchmark/profile after each accepted patch
continue through multiple minimal patches when one patch only closes part of the gap
record every attempt, failed idea, partial win, rejected source idea, and final selected patch in artifacts

Phase 3: Start RLCR

Before starting Humanize from the vLLM checkout:

Ensure the vLLM checkout is a git repository with at least one commit and a clean working tree, excluding only gitignored Humanize runtime state.
Ensure .humanize* is gitignored so RLCR state, round summaries, and local checkpoints cannot be staged accidentally.
Ensure the intended review base branch is present locally. Pass --base-branch <branch> if Humanize's auto-detection would be ambiguous.
Do not start a new loop if any existing .humanize/rlcr/*/state.md is active in the vLLM checkout. Resume, finish, or cancel the old model loop first.

From the vLLM checkout, run:

"$HUMANIZE_RUNTIME_ROOT/scripts/setup-rlcr-loop.sh" \
  .humanize/vllm-sota-agent/refined-plan.md --yolo --strict-success

If HUMANIZE_RUNTIME_ROOT is not already set by the client/plugin environment, resolve it to the installed Humanize runtime first. In Codex, this is often ${CODEX_HOME:-~/.codex}/skills/humanize; in Claude Code it is often ~/.claude/skills/humanize or a plugin-provided Humanize runtime. If setup exits non-zero, stop and report the error. Do not bypass the gate.

After setup succeeds:

Find the active state file with find .humanize/rlcr -maxdepth 2 -name state.md -print.
Verify the state file exists and contains strict_success: true.
Read .humanize/rlcr/<timestamp>/round-0-prompt.md.
Execute the current round.
Commit vLLM changes.
Write the required Humanize round summary.
Stop normally so the native Humanize Stop hook can review.

If no active state file exists, or if strict_success: true is missing, stop and report that RLCR did not start correctly. Do not continue into vLLM patch work outside the Humanize loop. If the hook blocks exit, follow the generated next-round prompt exactly.

Inside Each RLCR Round

Gap Decision

At the start of every round, compute current vLLM's gap against the best SLA-passing framework for each fixed scenario.

Use 1% as the default stable noise threshold. If the current result is within +/-1%, rerun the winning commands enough times to decide whether the gap is stable before choosing a patch.

Patch only when vLLM is slower than the best framework by more than 1%, fails SLA while another framework passes, or has a profiled bottleneck that explains the remaining gap under the fixed workload.

If vLLM is already best or tied within the stable threshold, write the final report and stop under the normal Humanize review path.

Required Profiling

When vLLM is behind, profile the current best vLLM command and the leading competitor command with llm-torch-profiler-analysis.

Rules:

Always profile vLLM when it is behind.
Always profile at least the current best framework.
If both SGLang and TensorRT-LLM are more than 1% ahead of vLLM in a stable result, profile both.
Use the slow benchmark scenario lengths, not the profiler defaults:
- prefill profile: slow input length -> 1 output token
- decode profile: 1 input token -> slow output length
For mixed or production datasets, use the slowest representative p50 or p95 bucket already recorded by the benchmark artifact.
Capture or analyze separate prefill and decode evidence when the framework supports it.

For every profiled framework, save the same three tables:

kernel table
overlap-opportunity table
fuse-pattern table

Then write or update analysis/root-cause.md with the current cross-framework comparison: which stage is slower, which table rows explain it, and which vLLM source paths or kernel families are plausible patch targets.

Do not patch vLLM until this report exists for the current gap.

Layer Pipeline Deep Dive

Run llm-pipeline-analysis inside every RLCR round after profiler triage and before choosing a patch target.

The report must identify:

the chosen forward pass and why it is representative
the relevant layer types, especially for heterogeneous layers such as MoE, hash layers, or compress_ratios
representative layers for the patch target
top hot kernels in those representative layers
any Perfetto time ranges needed for inspection

Use the profiled vLLM trace and the served model config. Write analysis/layer-pipeline.md with the chosen forward pass, layer-type timing table, representative layers, top hot kernels, and any Perfetto ranges used for inspection. Do not choose a vLLM patch before this report exists for the current round.

Kernel Evidence Assist

Use ncu-report-skill only when the active RLCR round is writing a concrete kernel or small kernel-family patch and torch-profiler evidence is not enough to choose or validate the next edit.

Kernel-level assistance is allowed only when all of these are true:

vLLM is still more than 1% behind the best framework for the fixed benchmark scenario after the required repeat/profiler checks.
The slow stage has a concrete vLLM kernel or tightly scoped kernel family in the kernel table with at least 1% cumulative GPU-time share. Do not spend kernel-specialist effort on a lone kernel below 1% share unless a shared implementation affects an aggregated family above 1%.
llm-pipeline-analysis has identified the representative layer/forward pass and top hot kernels for the current round.
The proposed kernel target has a clear correctness reference, representative shapes/dtypes/layouts from the model run, and a path to wire the candidate into the active vLLM serving code.

For each eligible kernel target:

Read ncu-report-skill/SKILL.md and follow its Nsight Compute workflow for harness construction, ncu collection, report parsing, stall diagnosis, and evidence-backed next-edit selection.
Store NCU outputs under kernel/ncu-digests/<version>/ or the host's equivalent artifact root. Each digest must compare baseline vs candidate and end with exactly one concrete next edit.
Patch the vLLM kernel or call path directly in the vLLM checkout, with focused correctness and microbench coverage when available. CUDA and C++ kernel code lives under csrc/, Triton kernels and attention/quantization wrappers live under vllm/, and torch.compile-driven paths live under vllm/compilation/.
Wire the candidate into the active model-serving path that produced the original profiler row.
Re-run the same real-model benchmark and profiler after the candidate is correct. A microbench or NCU win alone is not success.

If no focused harness exists, build the smallest harness that preserves the model-derived shapes/dtypes/layouts. If NCU cannot run on the host, record the blocker in the digest path and keep the next edit grounded in the available torch-profiler, layer-pipeline, and source evidence.

Do not start any standalone .humanize/rlcr session for a kernel target. Kernel work stays inside the active model RLCR loop.

Model-Loop Checkpoint

After every accepted round, update humanize/model-loop-checkpoint.md with:

original model, tokenizer, precision, quantization, hardware, workload, SLA, artifact root, and benchmark winner commands
current vLLM branch, commit, patches applied, tests run, and current best vLLM benchmark row
remaining gap, profiler rows, model PR history notes, layer-pipeline notes, NCU digest paths, rejected source ideas, and the next planned vLLM patch

This checkpoint is for campaign recovery inside the same model-level workflow. It records enough context to resume the campaign without losing benchmark/profile lineage.

Loop Ledgers

Keep these files under the run artifact root or the vLLM checkout, depending on the host convention:

humanize/attempt-ledger.md
humanize/optimization-ledger.md
humanize/source-idea-ledger.md
humanize/lineage.jsonl
humanize/profile-digests/

Every patch attempt gets an attempt row. Only correct patches with measured improvement get optimization rows. Source ideas must include profiler rows, layer-pipeline evidence, NCU report paths when used, and code provenance so later rounds can avoid re-reading the same source. Model PR history evidence should be recorded beside vLLM, SGLang, TensorRT-LLM, and NCU source ideas when it influenced the patch.

After two consecutive rounds with less than 1% geomean improvement over the prior best vLLM result, expand code-first research before editing again. Prefer code and PR evidence from vLLM, SGLang, TensorRT-LLM, and relevant kernel source guides before prose-only articles.

Stop Conditions

Stop only when one of these is true:

vLLM beats the best SLA-passing SGLang/TensorRT-LLM result on the fixed workload.
vLLM is tied within the stable 1% threshold after repeat runs.
The remaining gap is proven external to vLLM, such as unavailable hardware support, missing framework dependency, unsupported TensorRT-LLM PyTorch backend, or model weights that cannot be loaded fairly.
Profile evidence shows the remaining hot path is already near the relevant hardware or algorithmic limit and no low-risk vLLM patch remains.

The final report must include the fixed benchmark table, post-patch benchmark table, all winner commands, model PR history paths, profile paths, layer-pipeline paths when used, NCU digest paths when used, vLLM changed files, tests, and whether vLLM reached target-environment SOTA.