abotclaw-progress-critic

name: abotclaw-progress-critic description: Use a deployed VLAC-style vision-language-action critic service to evaluate task progress, compare current observations against a reference image, and judge task completion from robot camera frames. Use when the agent needs external progress supervision, completion verification, failure detection, or image-based task-state comparison for Piper, Unitree G1, or Unitree Go2.

AbotClaw Progress Critic

Use this skill when a robot task needs an external judge instead of relying only on hand-written heuristics.

This skill is about using an already deployed critic service, not deploying the service.

What This Service Does

The VLAC critic can compare:

• a current frame
• a reference frame
• a task description

and return progress or completion-related judgment.

This is useful for:

• task progress estimation
• task completion verification
• detecting failed or unchanged task state
• deciding whether the robot should continue, retry, or stop

Service Contract

For the FastAPI service in this stack:

• endpoint: POST /critic
• required inputs:
  • image
  • reference_image
  • task_description

Important:

• image and reference_image must be sent in the same request
• there is no separate reference-image cache/upload endpoint

Minimal Request Shape

{
  "image": "<base64_or_url_or_path>",
  "reference_image": "<base64_or_url_or_path>",
  "task_description": "..."
}

Responsibility Boundary

This skill owns:

• when to use the critic
• how to call /critic
• how to prepare current image + reference image + task description
• how to use critic results to decide continue / retry / stop

This skill does not own robot SDK discovery. Use abotclaw-sdk-discovery to learn how each robot provides camera frames.

When to Use It

Use the critic when:

• the robot needs a visual completion check
• hand-authored success conditions are unreliable
• the user asks "is it done?" or "did that succeed?"
• a task needs step-wise supervision from images
• you want to compare current state against a known target state

Standard Workflow

1. Use abotclaw-sdk-discovery to learn how the target robot exposes camera frames.
2. Capture a current frame from Piper, G1, or Go2.
3. Obtain a reference image that represents the desired or comparison state.
4. Write a task description that matches the intended goal.
5. Call the critic service with all three inputs in one request.
6. Interpret the response as supervision for task control.

Current Image Sources

The current observation can come from any robot in the fleet:

• Piper camera
• G1 camera
• Go2 camera

Choose the camera that best reflects task progress.

Examples:

• Piper wrist or workcell camera for tabletop manipulation
• G1 head or chest camera for humanoid interaction tasks
• Go2 forward camera for inspection or navigation-adjacent tasks

Reference Image Sources

A reference image may come from:

• a successful prior run
• a user-provided target image
• a recorded frame from a known-good final state
• a memory/evidence image from abotclaw-memory

Example Request

Get the correct host and port from service.md.

curl -s -X POST <VLAC_BASE_URL>/critic \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{
    "image":"<current_frame>",
    "reference_image":"<reference_frame>",
    "task_description":"Put the bowl back into the white storage box."
  }'

Input Preparation Rules

image

Use the robot's current frame.

reference_image

Use an image that represents the expected target state or a meaningful comparison state.

task_description

Keep it concrete and visual.

Better:

• "Put the bowl back into the white storage box."
• "Place the bottle upright on the tray."

Worse:

• "Do the task correctly."
• "Finish it."

How to Use the Result

Treat the critic output as task supervision, not absolute truth.

Possible uses:

• if the critic indicates strong completion -> stop or hand back success
• if the critic indicates partial progress -> continue
• if the critic indicates failure or no change -> retry, replan, or ask for help
• if the critic disagrees with sensor heuristics -> inspect evidence before acting further

Multi-Robot Usage Pattern

The image source does not have to come from the same robot that originally planned the task.

Examples:

• Go2 scouts a scene, then the critic evaluates whether the inspected target matches expectation
• Piper manipulates an object, and its current frame is checked against a reference finish state
• G1 performs a human-environment interaction task, and the critic judges completion from G1's current view

Integration with Memory

This skill works well with abotclaw-memory:

• use memory to retrieve a prior successful evidence image as reference_image
• use the critic to compare the current scene against remembered success state
• use critic output plus memory result to decide whether to navigate, manipulate, or stop

Behavioral Rule

Use the critic to reduce ambiguity in real-world execution, especially when success is easier to see than to hand-code.

Do not pretend the critic is a robot controller. It is a supervisor and evaluator.