name: pm-product-strategy description: "Build product strategy using Strategy Kernel, Playing to Win, LNO framework, and the 6Q Framework. Move from vision to coherent, defensible strategic choices." user-invocable: true argument-hint: "[product/company context or strategic question]"
Product Strategy
Help the user build or evaluate product strategy — the coherent set of choices about where to play and how to win.
When to Use
- Defining or refining product vision and strategic direction
- Evaluating whether to enter a new market or segment
- Building a strategy document or presentation for leadership
- Assessing whether current work is strategically coherent
- Preparing for strategy interviews or case studies
Step 1: Diagnose with the Strategy Kernel
Richard Rumelt's Strategy Kernel has three components:
1. Diagnosis
What is the core challenge? A good diagnosis simplifies complexity.
Template:
The critical challenge facing [product] is [specific challenge].
This matters because [consequence if unaddressed].
The root cause is [underlying driver], not [surface symptom].
2. Guiding Policy
The overall approach — a set of principles, not a list of actions.
Template:
We will [approach] by focusing on [specific domain/segment],
leveraging our advantage in [capability/asset],
while deliberately choosing NOT to [what you're saying no to].
3. Coherent Actions
Coordinated actions that carry out the guiding policy. Each reinforces the others.
Test: If you can remove one action without affecting the others, they're not coherent — they're just a task list.
Step 2: Apply the 6Q Framework
Ask these six questions in order to build a complete strategic assessment:
Q1: Right Industry?
- Apply Porter's Five Forces through Price - Cost = Profit lens
- Define industry by customer JTBD, not company boundaries
- Assess: Is the industry structurally attractive? Any existential threats?
- Can you shape the forces? (Facebook shaped social media by controlling supply, barriers, competition)
Q2: Right Time?
- Consumer trends → affect Price (demand shifts)
- Technology trends → affect both Price (new capabilities) and Cost (efficiency)
- Regulatory trends → affect both Price (enables/restricts) and Cost (compliance)
- Key test: Is value creation in flux? If stable → hard to enter. If in flux → window of opportunity.
Q3: Right to Win?
- Map Value Chain: Supply → Internal Processes → Channels → Customer
- Identify where you can innovate at each layer
- Apply Hamilton's 7 Powers: which do you have or can build?
- A product can be imitated; a value chain is hard to imitate
Q4: Right Segment?
- Segment on 3 dimensions: Fixed (who), Behavior (what), Mindset (why)
- Use CAC mnemonic: Core Drives / Aspirations / Constraints
- Find: Underserved + Large(Pop x WTP) + Right Time + Right to Win
Q5: Right Product?
- Design for target segment's JTBD: Mindset → Functional → Emotional outcome
- Activation: B=MAT (Motivation x Ability x Trigger)
- Habit formation: Cue → Routine → Reward
- Engagement: E = Frequency x Intensity
Q6: Right Positioning?
- Goal: Make it a NO-BRAINER for the target segment
- Choose generic strategy: Cost Leadership, Differentiation, or Focus
- Counter-positioning opportunities against incumbents
- Pricing: Van Westendorp → Feature ranking → Tier configuration
Q1-3 answer "SHOULD we enter?" | Q4-6 answer "Doing WHAT?"
Step 3: Evaluate with Playing to Win
A.G. Lafley and Roger Martin's five cascading choices:
1. What is our winning aspiration?
→ [Specific, measurable vision of success]
2. Where will we play?
→ Markets: [which geographies, segments, categories]
→ Channels: [which distribution channels]
→ Customers: [which customer segments]
3. How will we win?
→ [Specific value proposition and competitive advantage]
4. What capabilities must be in place?
→ [3-5 must-have capabilities to execute]
5. What management systems are required?
→ [Processes, tools, culture to sustain the strategy]
Key insight: These choices must be internally consistent. Each choice narrows and enables the next.
Step 4: Prioritize with LNO Framework
Classify all current work:
| Category | Definition | Example | Time Allocation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leverage | Compounding effect, enables future growth | Core platform, data flywheel | Maximize |
| Neutral | Maintains current state, necessary but not strategic | Bug fixes, minor improvements | Manage |
| Overhead | Consumes resources without real value | Excessive meetings, unnecessary reports | Minimize |
Exercise: List your team's top 10 current initiatives. Classify each as L, N, or O. If more than 30% is Overhead, you have a strategy execution problem.
Step 5: Validate Strategic Coherence
Red Flags of Bad Strategy
- Fluffy language — "We will leverage our synergies to drive best-in-class outcomes"
- No diagnosis — Jumping straight to actions without identifying the challenge
- Mistaking goals for strategy — "Our strategy is to grow 40%" is a goal, not a strategy
- Kitchen sink — A long list of priorities means no priorities
- No trade-offs — Strategy that doesn't say no to anything is a wish list
Strategy Test Questions
- Can you explain it in 2 sentences?
- Does it say no to something specific?
- Would a smart competitor make different choices?
- Does resource allocation match the stated strategy?
- Can a new team member use it to make a decision without asking you?
Which Framework to Choose
| Situation | Start With | Then Add |
|---|---|---|
| New product, new market | 6Q Framework (full assessment) | Playing to Win (cascading choices) |
| Existing product, strategic review | Strategy Kernel (diagnosis first) | LNO (classify current work) |
| Competitive pressure | 6Q Q1+Q3 (industry + right to win) | Porter's Five Forces deep-dive |
| Strategy presentation | Playing to Win (5 choices) | Strategy Kernel (narrative structure) |
| Team alignment | LNO (shared language for trade-offs) | Strategy Kernel (shared diagnosis) |
Common Mistakes
- Strategy as aspiration — "Be the market leader" is an aspiration, not a strategy. Strategy is the choices you make to get there.
- Feature-first thinking — Strategy starts with the customer problem and market, not the solution. Use Q4 (segment) before Q5 (product).
- Copying competitors — "They launched X, so we should too" is reactive, not strategic. Check whether X serves YOUR target segment's JTBD.
- Ignoring what you're saying no to — Every strategy must explicitly decline opportunities. If you can't name what you're NOT doing, you don't have a strategy.
- Annual strategy, daily tactics — Strategy should inform daily decisions. If your team can't connect their work to the strategy, it's shelf-ware.
- Resource allocation disconnect — The real strategy is visible in how you allocate people, time, and money — not in the deck.
Worked Example: B2B SaaS Analytics Tool
Diagnosis: "Our core challenge is that we're losing enterprise deals to incumbents who offer deeper integrations, while our actual advantage — speed of setup — appeals to mid-market teams who need answers today."
Guiding Policy: "We will own the 'fast time-to-insight' position for mid-market SaaS companies by making setup trivially easy and delivering value within the first session. We will NOT compete on integration depth with enterprise incumbents."
Coherent Actions:
- Pre-built connectors for the top 15 SaaS tools (covers 80% of mid-market stack)
- "Insights in 5 minutes" onboarding flow — zero-config dashboards from day 1
- Template library of 50+ pre-built analyses for common SaaS metrics
- Price at 1/3 of enterprise incumbents — no sales team, self-serve only