name: referral-letter-generator description: Generate medical referral letters with patient summary, reason for referral, key findings, and requested next steps; use when transferring care or communicating with another clinician or department. license: MIT author: AIPOCH
Medical Referral Letter Generator
A tool for generating professional medical referral letters for healthcare providers.
Quick Check
Use this command to verify that the packaged script entry point can be parsed before deeper execution.
python -m py_compile scripts/main.py
Audit-Ready Commands
Use these concrete commands for validation. They are intentionally self-contained and avoid placeholder paths.
python -m py_compile scripts/main.py
python scripts/main.py --help
python scripts/main.py --input "Audit validation sample with explicit symptoms, history, assessment, and next-step plan." --format json
When to Use
- Use this skill when the task is to Generate medical referral letters with patient summary, reason for referral.
- Use this skill for academic writing tasks that require explicit assumptions, bounded scope, and a reproducible output format.
- Use this skill when you need a documented fallback path for missing inputs, execution errors, or partial evidence.
Workflow
- Confirm the user objective, required inputs, and non-negotiable constraints before doing detailed work.
- Validate that the request matches the documented scope and stop early if the task would require unsupported assumptions.
- Use the packaged script path or the documented reasoning path with only the inputs that are actually available.
- Return a structured result that separates assumptions, deliverables, risks, and unresolved items.
- If execution fails or inputs are incomplete, switch to the fallback path and state exactly what blocked full completion.
Overview
This skill generates structured medical referral letters containing:
- Patient demographic information
- Reason for referral
- Relevant medical history
- Current medications and treatments
- Contact information for follow-up
Use Cases
- Referring patients to specialists (cardiology, neurology, oncology, etc.)
- Transferring care between hospitals or clinics
- Urgent referrals for emergency conditions
- Routine specialist consultations
Usage
Command Line
python scripts/main.py --input patient_data.json --output referral_letter.pdf
Python API
from scripts.main import generate_referral_letter
letter = generate_referral_letter(
patient_data={...},
referring_provider={...},
receiving_provider={...},
reason="...",
output_format="pdf" # or "docx", "html", "txt"
)
Input Parameters
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| patient_name | str | Yes | Patient full name |
| patient_dob | str | Yes | Date of birth (YYYY-MM-DD) |
| patient_id | str | Yes | Medical record number |
| diagnosis | str | Yes | Primary diagnosis/reason for referral |
| history | str | No | Relevant medical history |
| medications | list | No | Current medications |
| urgency | str | No | Routine/Urgent/Emergent |
| referring_doctor | str | Yes | Referring physician name |
| receiving_provider | str | Yes | Target specialist/facility |
Output Formats
- PDF: Professional formatted document (default)
- DOCX: Editable Word document
- HTML: Web-viewable format
- TXT: Plain text
Example
{
"patient_name": "John Doe",
"patient_dob": "1975-03-15",
"diagnosis": "Suspected coronary artery disease",
"reason": "Cardiology evaluation for chest pain",
"urgency": "Urgent"
}
Technical Notes
- Difficulty: Medium
- Dependencies: Python 3.8+, reportlab (PDF), python-docx (DOCX)
- Compliance: Follows HIPAA guidelines for PHI handling
- Validation: Input validation for required fields
References
See references/ folder for:
- Sample referral letter templates
- Medical terminology guidelines
- Privacy compliance checklist
Safety & Privacy
- All patient data is processed locally
- No external API calls for patient information
- Automatic PHI redaction in logs
- Secure temporary file handling
Risk Assessment
| Risk Indicator | Assessment | Level |
|---|---|---|
| Code Execution | Python/R scripts executed locally | Medium |
| Network Access | No external API calls | Low |
| File System Access | Read input files, write output files | Medium |
| Instruction Tampering | Standard prompt guidelines | Low |
| Data Exposure | Output files saved to workspace | Low |
Security Checklist
- No hardcoded credentials or API keys
- No unauthorized file system access (../)
- Output does not expose sensitive information
- Prompt injection protections in place
- Input file paths validated (no ../ traversal)
- Output directory restricted to workspace
- Script execution in sandboxed environment
- Error messages sanitized (no stack traces exposed)
- Dependencies audited
Prerequisites
# Python dependencies
pip install -r requirements.txt
Evaluation Criteria
Success Metrics
- Successfully executes main functionality
- Output meets quality standards
- Handles edge cases gracefully
- Performance is acceptable
Test Cases
- Basic Functionality: Standard input → Expected output
- Edge Case: Invalid input → Graceful error handling
- Performance: Large dataset → Acceptable processing time
Lifecycle Status
- Current Stage: Draft
- Next Review Date: 2026-03-06
- Known Issues: None
- Planned Improvements:
- Performance optimization
- Additional feature support
Output Requirements
Every final response should make these items explicit when they are relevant:
- Objective or requested deliverable
- Inputs used and assumptions introduced
- Workflow or decision path
- Core result, recommendation, or artifact
- Constraints, risks, caveats, or validation needs
- Unresolved items and next-step checks
Error Handling
- If required inputs are missing, state exactly which fields are missing and request only the minimum additional information.
- If the task goes outside the documented scope, stop instead of guessing or silently widening the assignment.
- If
scripts/main.pyfails, report the failure point, summarize what still can be completed safely, and provide a manual fallback. - Do not fabricate files, citations, data, search results, or execution outcomes.
Input Validation
This skill accepts requests that match the documented purpose of referral-letter-generator and include enough context to complete the workflow safely.
Do not continue the workflow when the request is out of scope, missing a critical input, or would require unsupported assumptions. Instead respond:
referral-letter-generatoronly handles its documented workflow. Please provide the missing required inputs or switch to a more suitable skill.
Response Template
Use the following fixed structure for non-trivial requests:
- Objective
- Inputs Received
- Assumptions
- Workflow
- Deliverable
- Risks and Limits
- Next Checks
If the request is simple, you may compress the structure, but still keep assumptions and limits explicit when they affect correctness.
When Not to Use
- Do not proceed when required input files, identifiers, parameters, or context are missing — ask the user to provide them first.
- Do not assume capabilities beyond this skill's declared scope when the user requests external operations or inferences.
- Do not proceed without user confirmation when overwriting existing results, executing high-cost batch operations, or expanding task scope.
Required Inputs
| Field | Required | Format/Source | Example | If Missing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| User task description | Yes | Text | Research question, writing goal, analysis objective | Stop and ask user to provide |
| Primary input material | Depends on task | Text, file path, ID, table, or literature | PMID, PDF, CSV, DOCX, keywords, etc. | Specify which material type is missing |
| Output preference | No | Text | Language, format, target journal, template | Use skill default format |
Output Contract
- Primary output: Structured result or target file aligned with this skill's objective.
- Optional output: Intermediate check notes, issue list, supplementary suggestions, or generated file paths.
- Format requirement: Unless the user specifies otherwise, prefer stable, reviewable Markdown or JSON; if the skill's bundled script requires a fixed format, use that format.
- If partially complete: Must explicitly mark as PARTIAL and state which steps are completed and which remain.
Failure Handling
- Missing critical input: Explicitly state which fields, files, or identifiers are missing and pause.
- Script, template, or resource execution failure: Report the failing step, likely cause, and recovery suggestions — do not silently degrade.
- Partial completion only: Return the verified portion first, then list remaining blockers and suggested next steps.
User Checkpoints
- Before executing batch processing, overwriting files, long-running searches, or multi-stage generation, confirm scope and output format with the user.
- Before proceeding when a key judgment is ambiguous, evidence is insufficient, or the workflow is entering the next stage, confirm with the user.
Quick Validation
- Check that key scripts, templates, or reference file paths this skill depends on exist.
- Check that the final output contains the core fields, sections, or files specified for this task.
- Check that results clearly mark assumptions, limitations, and incomplete items.