name: openspec-apply-change description: Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change. Use when the user wants to start implementing, continue implementation, or work through tasks. license: MIT compatibility: Requires openspec CLI. metadata: author: openspec version: "1.0" generatedBy: "1.4.1"
Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change.
Input: Optionally specify a change name. If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes.
Steps
Select the change
If a name is provided, use it. Otherwise:
- Infer from conversation context if the user mentioned a change
- Auto-select if only one active change exists
- If ambiguous, run
openspec list --jsonto get available changes and use the AskUserQuestion tool to let the user select
Always announce: "Using change:
" and how to override (e.g., /opsx-apply <other>).Check status to understand the schema
openspec status --change "<name>" --jsonParse the JSON to understand:
schemaName: The workflow being used (e.g., "spec-driven")planningHome,changeRoot, andactionContext: planning scope and edit constraints- Which artifact contains the tasks (typically "tasks" for spec-driven, check status for others)
Get apply instructions
openspec instructions apply --change "<name>" --jsonThis returns:
contextFiles: artifact ID -> array of concrete file paths (varies by schema - could be proposal/specs/design/tasks or spec/tests/implementation/docs)- Progress (total, complete, remaining)
- Task list with status
- Dynamic instruction based on current state
Handle states:
- If
state: "blocked"(missing artifacts): show message, suggest using openspec-continue-change - If
state: "all_done": congratulate, suggest archive - Otherwise: proceed to implementation
Workspace guard: If status JSON reports
actionContext.mode: "workspace-planning"andallowedEditRootsis empty, explain that full workspace apply is not supported in this slice. Treat linked repos and folders as read-only context, ask the user to select an affected area through an explicit implementation workflow, and STOP before editing files.Read context files
Read every file path listed under
contextFilesfrom the apply instructions output. The files depend on the schema being used:- spec-driven: proposal, specs, design, tasks
- Other schemas: follow the contextFiles from CLI output
Show current progress
Display:
- Schema being used
- Progress: "N/M tasks complete"
- Remaining tasks overview
- Dynamic instruction from CLI
Implement tasks (loop until done or blocked)
For each pending task:
- Show which task is being worked on
- Make the code changes required
- Keep changes minimal and focused
- Mark task complete in the tasks file:
- [ ]→- [x] - Continue to next task
Pause if:
- Task is unclear → ask for clarification
- Implementation reveals a design issue → suggest updating artifacts
- Error or blocker encountered → report and wait for guidance
- User interrupts
On completion or pause, show status
Display:
- Tasks completed this session
- Overall progress: "N/M tasks complete"
- If all done: suggest archive
- If paused: explain why and wait for guidance
Output During Implementation
## Implementing: <change-name> (schema: <schema-name>)
Working on task 3/7: <task description>
[...implementation happening...]
✓ Task complete
Working on task 4/7: <task description>
[...implementation happening...]
✓ Task complete
Output On Completion
## Implementation Complete
**Change:** <change-name>
**Schema:** <schema-name>
**Progress:** 7/7 tasks complete ✓
### Completed This Session
- [x] Task 1
- [x] Task 2
...
All tasks complete! Ready to archive this change.
Output On Pause (Issue Encountered)
## Implementation Paused
**Change:** <change-name>
**Schema:** <schema-name>
**Progress:** 4/7 tasks complete
### Issue Encountered
<description of the issue>
**Options:**
1. <option 1>
2. <option 2>
3. Other approach
What would you like to do?
Guardrails
- Keep going through tasks until done or blocked
- Always read context files before starting (from the apply instructions output)
- If task is ambiguous, pause and ask before implementing
- If implementation reveals issues, pause and suggest artifact updates
- Keep code changes minimal and scoped to each task
- Update task checkbox immediately after completing each task
- Pause on errors, blockers, or unclear requirements - don't guess
- Use contextFiles from CLI output, don't assume specific file names
Fluid Workflow Integration
This skill supports the "actions on a change" model:
- Can be invoked anytime: Before all artifacts are done (if tasks exist), after partial implementation, interleaved with other actions
- Allows artifact updates: If implementation reveals design issues, suggest updating artifacts - not phase-locked, work fluidly